Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29574600›Full record

Trial reportNeuroradiology2018

Rates and predictors of futile recanalization in patients undergoing endovascular treatment in a multicenter clinical trial.

Haitham M Hussein, Muhammad A Saleem, Adnan I Qureshi

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuroradiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 57 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05836766 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Cilostazol Dexborneol Versus Placebo for Microcirculation Dysfunction After Reperfusion Therapy in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke With Large Vessel Occlusion: A Phase Ⅱa,Prospective,Multicenter,Randomized, Double-blind,Placebo-controlled Parallel Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeijing Tiantan HospitalRan2023 to 2024Enrolled120ConditionsAcute Ischemic Stroke, Reperfusion, Large Vessel OcclusionArmsY-6 sublingual tablets, Placebo tablets of Y-6 sublingual tablet
NCT06077305 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

A Registry Study of Microcirculation Disorder After Cerebral Small Vessel Disease and Ischemic Stroke, MODEST, Research Protocol

TypeobservationalSponsorBeijing Tiantan HospitalRan2023 to 2026Enrolled20,000ConditionsCerebral Small Vessel Diseases, Ischemic Stroke
NCT06138834 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Y-6 Sublingual Tablets for Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Phase Ⅱ, Randomized, Double-blind, Double-dummy, Placebo-controlled Parallel Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeijing Tiantan HospitalRan2023 to 2025Enrolled300ConditionsAcute Ischemic Stroke, Large Vessel Occlusion, ReperfusionArmsLow-dose Y-6 sublingual tablets, High-dose Y-6 sublingual tablets, Low-dose Cilostazol, High-dose Cilostazol, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 93 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. EStroke and vascular neurology · 2025
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Mitochondria dysfunction, a potential cytoprotection target against ischemia-reperfusion injury in a mouse stroke model.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. No-reflow after recanalization in ischemic stroke: From pathomechanisms to therapeutic strategies.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2024
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Haitham M HusseinRegions Hospital Comprehensive Stroke Center, 640 Jackson St, St Paul, MN, 55101, USA. Haitham.M.Hussein@healthpartners.com.
Muhammad A SaleemZeenat Qureshi Stroke Institute, St Cloud, MN, USA.
Adnan I QureshiZeenat Qureshi Stroke Institute, St Cloud, MN, USA.
CentraCare Health System · USRegions Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe phenomenon of futile recanalization, defined as lack of clinical benefit despite angiographic recanalization, is an important limitation of endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke. We aim to characterize the occurrence and predictors of futile recanalization in the endovascular arm of the Interventional Management of Stroke (IMS) III trial.

methodsPatients with near complete or complete recanalization (TICI grades 2b and 3) were divided according to functional outcome at 3 months into "meaningful recanalization," defined as mRS score 0-2, and "futile recanalization," mRS score 3-6. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors of futile recanalization.

resultsFutile recanalization was observed in 61 (47%) of 130. Compared to meaningful recanalization group, the futile recanalization group had higher proportion of women (62.3 vs. 43.5%; p = 0.032), higher incidence of diabetes mellitus (29.5 vs. 8.7%; p = 0.004) and coronary artery disease (27.9 vs. 13%; p = 0.05), higher baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores (median [range] 19 [11-31] vs. 15 [8-26], p < 0.001), higher baseline serum glucose (7.6 ± 2.6 vs. 6.7 ± 1.7 mmol/L; p = 0.039), and longer onset-to-start of endovascular treatment time (265.8 ± 48.3 vs. 239.2 ± 47.7 min; p = 0.007). In multivariate analysis, NIHSS (OR 1.3; 95% CI 1.1-1.4), female gender (OR 3.0; 95% CI 1.1-8.2), and onset-to-start of endovascular treatment time (OR 1.2; 95% CI 1.1-1.3) were independent predictors of futile recanalization.

conclusionIn IMS III, futile recanalization was common. Delay in endovascular treatment is the only modifiable risk factor. Additional strategies for non-modifiable risk factors-female gender and high NIHSS-need to be identified.

Indexed as

Treatment FailureAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrain IschemiaCerebral RevascularizationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSex FactorsStrokeAcute ischemic strokeEndovascular treatmentFutile recanalizationMechanical thrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID29574600
OpenAlexW2792830358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.