ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2018
Characterization and modelling of looming-sensitive neurons in the crab Neohelice.
Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dynamic trajectory cues drive sequenced integration in approach detectors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Responses of a locust visual interneuron correlate with simple and compound object motion within the vertical plane.The Journal of experimental biology · 2025Article
- A Computationally Efficient Neuronal Model for Collision Detection with Contrast Polarity-Specific Feed-Forward Inhibition.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- A Looming Spatial Localization Neural Network Inspired by MLG1 Neurons in the CrabFrontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Looming-sensitive neurons (LSNs) are motion-sensitive neurons tuned for detecting imminent collision. Their main characteristic is the selectivity to looming (a 2D representation of an object approach), rather than to receding stimuli. We studied a set of LSNs by performing surface extracellular recordings in the optic nerve of Neohelice granulata crabs, and characterized their response against computer-generated visual stimuli with different combinations of moving edges, highlighting different components of the optical flow. In addition to their selectivity to looming stimuli, we characterized other properties of these neurons, such as low directionality; reduced response to sustained excitement; and an inhibition phenomenon in response to visual stimuli with dense optical flow of expansion, contraction, and translation. To analyze the spatio-temporal processing of these LSNs, we proposed a biologically plausible computational model which was inspired by previous computational models of the locust lobula giant motion detector (LGMD) neuron. The videos seen by the animal during electrophysiological experiments were applied as an input to the model which produced a satisfactory fit to the measured responses, suggesting that the computation performed by LSNs in a decapod crustacean appears to be based on similar physiological processing previously described for the LGMD in insects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.