Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29574581›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2018

New Algorithm for the Prediction of Cardiovascular Risk in Symptomatic Adults with Stable Chest Pain.

Muralidhar R Papireddy, Carl J Lavie, Abhizith Deoker, Hadii Mamudu, Timir K Paul

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Muralidhar R PapireddyDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Quillen College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, 329 N State of Franklin Rd, Johnson City, TN, 37604, USA.
Carl J LavieDepartment of Cardiology, Ochsner Clinical School, The University of Queensland School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Abhizith DeokerDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Tech University, El Paso, TX, USA.
Hadii MamuduDepartment of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA.
Timir K PaulDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Quillen College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University, 329 N State of Franklin Rd, Johnson City, TN, 37604, USA. pault@etsu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewTo review the landmark studies in predicting obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) in symptomatic patients with stable chest pain and identify better prediction tools and propose a simplified algorithm to guide the health care providers in identifying low risk patients to defer further testing. RECENT

findingsThere are a few risk prediction models described for stable chest pain patients including Diamond-Forrester (DF), Duke Clinical Score (DCS), CAD Consortium Basic, Clinical, and Extended models. The CAD Consortium models demonstrated that DF and DCS models overestimate the probability of CAD. All CAD Consortium models performed well in the contemporary population. PROMISE trial secondary data results showed that a clinical tool using readily available ten very low-risk pre-test variables could discriminate low-risk patients to defer further testing safely. In the contemporary population, CAD Consortium Basic or Clinical model could be used with more confidence. Our proposed simple algorithm would guide the physicians in selecting low risk patients who can be managed conservatively with deferred testing strategy. Future research is needed to validate our proposed algorithm to identify the low-risk patients with stable chest pain for whom further testing may not be warranted.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsChest PainCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseHumansPredictive Value of TestsRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsROC CurveAlgorithmsCardiovascular riskCoronary artery diseasePre-test probabilityStable chest pain

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.