Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29574575›Full record

ReviewArchives of dermatological research2018

Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) vs. monoethyl fumarate (MEF) salts for the treatment of plaque psoriasis: a review of clinical data.

Lilla Landeck, Khusru Asadullah, Adriana Amasuno, Ignasi Pau-Charles, Ulrich Mrowietz

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of dermatological research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Prodrug Approach as a Strategy to Enhance Drug Permeability.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Emerging Therapeutic Applications for Fumarates.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. [Management of plaque psoriasis in adults].Der Hautarzt; Zeitschrift fur Dermatologie, Venerologie, und verwandte Gebiete · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lilla LandeckDepartment of Dermatology, Ernst von Bergmann General Hospital, Teaching Hospital Charité, Humboldt University, Charlottenstrasse 72, 14467, Potsdam, Germany. llandeck@klinikumevb.de.
Khusru AsadullahDepartment of Dermatology, Venerology and Allergology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Adriana AmasunoAlmirall S.A., Barcelona, Spain.
Ignasi Pau-CharlesAlmirall S.A., Barcelona, Spain.
Ulrich MrowietzPsoriasis-Center at the Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany.
Almirall (Spain) · ESCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEClinical Research Center Kiel · DEKlinikum Ernst von Bergmann · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fumarates (fumaric acid esters, FAEs) are orally administered systemic agents used for the treatment of psoriasis and multiple sclerosis. In 1994, a proprietary combination of FAEs was licensed for psoriasis by the German Drug Administration for use within Germany. Since then, fumarates have been established as one of the most commonly used treatments for moderate-to-severe psoriasis in Germany and other countries. The licensed FAE formulation contains dimethyl fumarate (DMF), as well as calcium, zinc, and magnesium salts of monoethyl fumarate (MEF). While the clinical efficacy of this FAE mixture is well established, the combination of esters on which it is based, and its dosing regimen, was determined empirically. Since the mid-1990s, the modes of action and contribution of the different FAEs to their overall therapeutic effect in psoriasis, as well as their adverse event profile, have been investigated in more detail. In this article, the available clinical data for DMF are reviewed and compared with data for the other FAEs. The current evidence substantiates that DMF is the main active compound, via its metabolic transformation to monomethyl fumarate (MMF). A recent phase III randomized and placebo-controlled trial including more than 700 patients demonstrated therapeutic equivalence when comparing the licensed FAE combination with DMF alone, in terms of psoriasis clearance according to the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA). Thus, DMF as monotherapy for the treatment of psoriasis is as efficacious as in combination with MEF, making the addition of such fumarate derivatives unnecessary.

Indexed as

Dermatologic AgentsDimethyl FumarateDrug Therapy, CombinationFumaratesGermanyHumansPsoriasisRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeDermatologic AgentsDimethyl Fumarateethyl fumarateFumaratesDimethyl fumarateDMFFumaric acid estersMEFMonoethyl fumaratePsoriasis

Identifiers

PMID29574575
PMCPMC6060759
OpenAlexW2791287085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.