Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29574526›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2018

Differential item functioning for items in Berger's HIV Stigma Scale: an analysis of cohorts from the Indian, Swedish, and US contexts.

Maria Reinius, Deepa Rao, Lisa E Manhart, Maria Wiklander, Veronica Svedhem, John Pryor, Randall Mayer, Bambi Gaddist, Shuba Kumar, Rani Mohanraj and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Psychometric Properties of the Berger HIV Stigma Scale: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Maria ReiniusDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77, Solna, Sweden. maria.reinius@ki.se.ORCID 0000-0003-0864-8701
Deepa RaoDepartment of Global Health and Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, 325 9th Ave, UW Campus Mailbox Number 359931, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA.
Lisa E ManhartDepartment of Epidemiology, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, 325 9th Ave, UW Campus Mailbox Number 35993, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA.
Maria WiklanderDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, SE-141 83, Huddinge, Sweden.
Veronica SvedhemDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, SE-141 86, Huddinge, Sweden.
John PryorDepartment of Psychology, Illinois State University, Normal, IL, USA.
Randall MayerIowa Department of Public Health, 321 E. 12th St, Des Moines, IA, 50319-0075, USA.
Bambi GaddistJoseph H. Neal Wellness Center Dba SC HIV Council, 1813 Laurel Street, Columbia, SC, 29201, USA.
Shuba KumarDepartment of Social Sciences, Samarth, Chennai, India.
Rani MohanrajDepartment of Social Sciences, Samarth, Chennai, India.
Lakshmanan JeyaseelanDepartment of Biostatistics, Christian Medical College, Vellore, India.
Lena WettergrenDepartment of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, SE-141 83, Huddinge, Sweden.
Lars E ErikssonDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, SE-171 77, Solna, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo examine whether items in Berger's HIV Stigma Scale function differently with persons of different age, gender, and cultural backgrounds.

methodsSecondary data from cohorts, collected in South India (n = 250), Sweden (n = 193), and the US (n = 603) were reanalyzed to evaluate DIF within, between, and across these cohorts. All participants had answered the revised version of the HIV stigma scale consisting of 32 items forming the subscales Personalized stigma, Disclosure concerns, Concerns about public attitudes, and Negative self-image. Differential Item Functioning (DIF) for these items was assessed using hybrid ordinal regression-IRT technique. When DIF was detected, the cumulative impact of DIF on individual subscale scores was evaluated.

resultsDIF was detected for 9 items within, between, or across cohorts, but the DIF was negligible in general. Detected DIF between the Swedish and Indian cohorts had a cumulative salient impact on individual scores for the subscale Disclosure Concerns; Disclosure concerns were overestimated in the Swedish cohort and both over- and underestimated in the Indian cohort.

conclusionsThe items in the 32-item version of the HIV stigma scale did not seem to be particularly prone to present DIF. The DIF between the Indian and Swedish cohort for items in the subscale Disclosure Concerns could, however, result in both type I and type II errors if scores should be compared between the Indian and Swedish cohort.

Indexed as

Social StigmaFemaleHIVHumansIndiaMalePsychometricsQuality of LifeSurveys and QuestionnairesSwedenUnited StatesDifferential item functioningHIVItem Response TheoryPsychometricsStigmaThe HIV stigma scale

Identifiers

PMID29574526
PMCPMC5951887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.