Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29573648›Full record

Trial reportDrug and alcohol dependence2018

Atomoxetine for amphetamine-type stimulant dependence during buprenorphine treatment: A randomized controlled trial.

Richard S Schottenfeld, Marek C Chawarski, Mehmet Sofuoglu, Weng-Tink Chooi, Norzarina M Zaharim, M Azhar M Yasin, Imran Ahmad, Sharifah Zubaidiah Syed Jaapar, B Kasinather Vicknasingam

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Richard S SchottenfeldYale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
Marek C ChawarskiYale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States. Electronic address: marek.chawarski@yale.edu.
Mehmet SofuogluYale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States.
Weng-Tink ChooiSchool of Social Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Penang, Malaysia.
Norzarina M ZaharimSchool of Social Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Penang, Malaysia.
M Azhar M YasinSchool of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Health Campus 16150, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Imran AhmadSchool of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Health Campus 16150, Kelantan, Malaysia.
Sharifah Zubaidiah Syed JaaparSchool of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Health Campus 16150, Kelantan, Malaysia.
B Kasinather VicknasingamCentre for Drug Research, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 11800, Penang, Malaysia.
Universiti Sains Malaysia · MYYale University · US

Funding

HIV Risk Reduction and Drug Abuse Treatment in MalaysiaR01DA014718 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHOTTENFELD, RICHARD S · 2001 to 2013
$3.6M
IMPROVING EFFICACY OF DRUG ABUSE TREATMENTK24DA000445 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SCHOTTENFELD, RICHARD S · 2000 to 2009
$1.3M
NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA000445NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA014718
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmphetamine type stimulants (ATS) use is highly prevalent and frequently co-occurs with opioid dependence in Malaysia and Asian countries. No medications have established efficacy for treating ATS use disorder. This study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and potential efficacy of atomoxetine for treating ATS use disorder.

methodsParticipants with opioid and ATS dependence (N = 69) were enrolled in a pilot, double-blind, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial; all received buprenorphine/naloxone and behavioral counseling and were randomized to atomoxetine 80 mg daily (n = 33) or placebo (n = 33). The effect size of the between-group difference on the primary outcome, proportion of ATS-negative urine tests, was estimated using Cohen's d for the intention-to-treat (ITT) sample and for higher adherence subsample (≥60 days of atomoxetine or placebo ingestion).

resultsParticipants were all male with mean (SD) age 39.4 (6.8) years. The proportion of ATS-negative urine tests was higher in atomoxetine- compared to placebo-treated participants: 0.77 (0.63-0.91) vs. 0.67 (0.53-0.81, d = 0.26) in the ITT sample and 0.90 (0.75-1.00) vs. 0.64 (0.51-0.78, d = 0.56) in the higher adherence subsample. The proportion of days abstinent from ATS increased from baseline in both groups (p < 0.001) and did not differ significantly between atomoxetine- and placebo-treated participants (p = 0.42). Depressive symptoms were reduced from baseline in both groups (p < 0.02) with a greater reduction for atomoxetine- than placebo-treated participants (p < 0.02). There were no serious adverse events or adverse events leading to medication discontinuation.

conclusionsThe findings support clinical tolerability and safety and suggest potential efficacy of atomoxetine for treating ATS use disorder in this population.

Indexed as

Adrenergic Uptake InhibitorsAdultAmphetamine-Related DisordersAtomoxetine HydrochlorideBehavior TherapyBuprenorphineBuprenorphine, Naloxone Drug CombinationDepressionDouble-Blind MethodHumansMaleMiddle AgedNarcotic AntagonistsOpioid-Related DisordersPilot ProjectsTreatment OutcomeAdrenergic Uptake InhibitorsAtomoxetine HydrochlorideBuprenorphineBuprenorphine, Naloxone Drug CombinationNarcotic AntagonistsAmphetamine-type stimulantsAtomoxetineOpioidsPharmacotherapySubstance use disorder

Identifiers

PMID29573648
PMCPMC5911201
OpenAlexW2790930789

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.