Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29573431›Full record

ArticleThe New phytologist2018

Multiscale patterns and drivers of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in the roots and root-associated soil of a wild perennial herb.

Pil U Rasmussen, Luisa W Hugerth, F Guillaume Blanchet, Anders F Andersson, Björn D Lindahl, Ayco J M Tack

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The New phytologist, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The multidimensionality of soil macroecology.Global ecology and biogeography : a journal of macroecology · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Pil U RasmussenDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, SE-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-0607-4230
Luisa W HugerthSchool of Biotechnology, Science for Life Laboratory, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, PO Box 1031, SE-171 21, Solna, Sweden.
F Guillaume BlanchetDépartement de Biologie, Faculté des Sciences, Université de Sherbrooke, 2500 Boulevard Université, Sherbrooke, QC, J1K 2R1, Canada.
Anders F AnderssonSchool of Biotechnology, Science for Life Laboratory, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, PO Box 1031, SE-171 21, Solna, Sweden.
Björn D LindahlDepartment of Soil and Environment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7014, SE-750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.
Ayco J M TackDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Plant Sciences, Stockholm University, SE-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3550-1070
Science for Life Laboratory · SEStockholm University · SESwedish University of Agricultural Sciences · SEUniversité de Sherbrooke · CA

Funding

Biotieteiden ja Ympäristön Tutkimuksen Toimikunta 265761Maj ja Tor Nesslingin Säätiö 2014211Vetenskapsrådet 2015-03993
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi form diverse communities and are known to influence above-ground community dynamics and biodiversity. However, the multiscale patterns and drivers of AM fungal composition and diversity are still poorly understood. We sequenced DNA markers from roots and root-associated soil from Plantago lanceolata plants collected across multiple spatial scales to allow comparison of AM fungal communities among neighbouring plants, plant subpopulations, nearby plant populations, and regions. We also measured soil nutrients, temperature, humidity, and community composition of neighbouring plants and nonAM root-associated fungi. AM fungal communities were already highly dissimilar among neighbouring plants (c. 30 cm apart), albeit with a high variation in the degree of similarity at this small spatial scale. AM fungal communities were increasingly, and more consistently, dissimilar at larger spatial scales. Spatial structure and environmental drivers explained a similar percentage of the variation, from 7% to 25%. A large fraction of the variation remained unexplained, which may be a result of unmeasured environmental variables, species interactions and stochastic processes. We conclude that AM fungal communities are highly variable among nearby plants. AM fungi may therefore play a major role in maintaining small-scale variation in community dynamics and biodiversity.

Indexed as

MycobiomeSoil MicrobiologyGeographyMycorrhizaePlantagoSoilSoilarbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungicommunity compositionfungal communityMoran's eigenvector mapsplant communitysoil microbial communityspatial structure

Identifiers

PMID29573431
PMCPMC6282561
OpenAlexW2793564549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.