Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29573382›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2018

Human Adipose-Derived and Amniotic Fluid-Derived Stem Cells: A Preliminary In Vitro Study Comparing Myogenic Differentiation Capability.

Anna Bajek, Joanna Olkowska, Małgorzata Walentowicz-Sadłecka, Paweł Sadłecki, Marek Grabiec, Dorota Porowińska, Tomasz Drewa, Krzysztof Roszkowski

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Amniotic fluid characteristics and its application in stem cell therapy: A review.International journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna BajekDepartment of Tissue Engineering, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Joanna OlkowskaDepartment of Tissue Engineering, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Małgorzata Walentowicz-SadłeckaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Paweł SadłeckiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Marek GrabiecDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Dorota PorowińskaDepartment of Biochemistry, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland.
Tomasz DrewaDepartment of Tissue Engineering, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Krzysztof RoszkowskiDepartment of Oncology, Radiotherapy and Oncological Gynecology, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Nicolaus Copernicus University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Around the world, disabilities due to musculoskeletal disorders have increased and are a major health problem worldwide. In recent years, stem cells have been considered to be powerful tools for musculoskeletal tissue engineering. Human adipose-derived stem cells (hADSCs) and amniotic fluid-derived stem cells (hAFSCs) undergo typical differentiation process into cells of mesodermal origin and can be used to treat muscular system diseases. The aim of the present study was to compare the biological characteristic of stem cells isolated from different human tissues (adipose tissue and amniotic fluid) with respect to myogenic capacity and skeletal and smooth muscle differentiation under the same conditions. MATERIAL AND METHODS hAFSCs and hADSCs were isolated during standard medical procedures and widely characterized by specific markers expression and differentiation potential. Both cell types were induced toward smooth and striated muscles differentiation, which was assessed with the use of molecular techniques. RESULTS For phenotypic characterization, both stem cell types were assessed for the expression of OCT-4, SOX2, CD34, CD44, CD45, and CD90. Muscle-specific markers appeared in both stem cell types, but the proportion of positive cells showed differences depending on the experimental conditions used and the source from which the stem cells were isolated. CONCLUSIONS In this study, we demonstrated that hADSCs and hAFSCs have different capability of differentiation toward both muscle types. However, hADSCs seem to be a better source for myogenic protocols and can promote skeletal and smooth muscle regeneration through either direct muscle differentiation or by paracrine mechanism.

Indexed as

Adipose TissueAdiposityAdolescentAdultAmniotic FluidCell DifferentiationCell LineageCell ProliferationCells, CulturedFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMuscle DevelopmentMuscle, SkeletalPilot ProjectsRegeneration

Identifiers

PMID29573382
PMCPMC5882157
OpenAlexW2792617828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.