Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29573335›Full record

Trial reportAmerican journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons2018

Posttransplant reduction in preexisting donor-specific antibody levels after belatacept- versus cyclosporine-based immunosuppression: Post hoc analyses of BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT.

R A Bray, H M Gebel, R Townsend, M E Roberts, M Polinsky, L Yang, H-U Meier-Kriesche, C P Larsen

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05145296 (Non-Randomized, Single-Center Pilot Trial Assessing The Safety/Efficacy Of Targeting Peripheral And Central Humoral Alloimmune Memory With Daratumumab And With Belatacept In Highly HLA-Sensitized Patients Awaiting Kidney Transplantation), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05145296 phase2terminatednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Non-Randomized, Single-Center Pilot Trial Assessing The Safety/Efficacy Of Targeting Peripheral And Central Humoral Alloimmune Memory With Daratumumab And With Belatacept In Highly HLA-Sensitized Patients Awaiting Kidney Transplantation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, GrenobleRan2022 to 2025Enrolled5ConditionsSensitisation, Highly Sensitised Dialysis PatientsArmsEach patient will undergo in the first step of the study belatacept treatment and in the second apheresis and daratumumab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Posttransplant reduction in preexisting donor-specific antibody levels after belatacept- versus cyclosporine-based immunosuppression: Post hoc analyses of BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2018
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Belatacept in Kidney Transplantation: Reflecting on the Past, Shaping the Future.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025
    Review
  6. Immunosuppression Management in Heart Transplantation.Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Memory T follicular helper cells drive donor-specific antibodies independent of memory B cells and primary germinal center and alloantibody formation.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2023
    Article
  10. Preventing Rejection of the Kidney Transplant.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Three-Year Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients Switched From Calcineurin Inhibitor-Based Regimens to Belatacept as a Rescue Therapy.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Induction Therapy and Therapeutic Antibodies.Handbook of experimental pharmacology · 2022
    Article
  18. Optimization of de novo belatacept-based immunosuppression administered to renal transplant recipients.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Superior inhibition of alloantibody responses with selective CD28 blockade is CTLA-4 dependent and T follicular helper cell specific.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

R A BrayEmory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
H M GebelEmory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
R TownsendBristol-Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA.
M E RobertsBristol-Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA.
M PolinskyBristol-Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA.
L YangBristol-Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA.
H-U Meier-KriescheBristol-Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA.
C P LarsenEmory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Bristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · USEmory University · US

Funding

Harvard Clinical and Translational Science Center (UL1)UL1TR000170 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2012 to 2013
$31.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000170
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT were phase III studies of cytotoxic T-cell crossmatch-negative kidney transplant recipients randomized to belatacept more intense (MI)-based, belatacept less intense (LI)-based, or cyclosporine-based immunosuppression. Following study completion, presence/absence of HLA-specific antibodies was determined centrally via solid-phase flow cytometry screening. Stored sera from anti-HLA-positive patients were further tested with a single-antigen bead assay to determine antibody specificities, presence/absence of donor-specific antibodies (DSAs), and mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of any DSAs present. The effect of belatacept-based and cyclosporine-based immunosuppression on MFI was explored post hoc in patients with preexisting DSAs enrolled to BENEFIT and BENEFIT-EXT. In BENEFIT, preexisting DSAs were detected in 4.6%, 4.9%, and 6.3% of belatacept MI-treated, belatacept LI-treated, and cyclosporine-treated patients, respectively. The corresponding values in BENEFIT-EXT were 6.0%, 5.7%, and 9.2%. In both studies, most preexisting DSAs were of class I specificity. Over the first 24 months posttransplant, a greater proportion of preexisting DSAs in belatacept-treated versus cyclosporine-treated patients exhibited decreases or no change in MFI. MFI decline was more apparent with belatacept MI-based versus belatacept LI-based immunosuppression in both studies and more pronounced in BENEFIT-EXT versus BENEFIT. Although derived post hoc, these data suggest that belatacept-based immunosuppression decreases preexisting DSAs more effectively than cyclosporine-based immunosuppression.

Indexed as

Tissue DonorsAbataceptCyclosporineFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGraft RejectionGraft SurvivalHumansImmune ToleranceImmunosuppressive AgentsInternational AgenciesIsoantibodiesKidney Failure, ChronicKidney TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedAbataceptCyclosporineImmunosuppressive AgentsIsoantibodiesantibody biologyclinical research/practiceclinical trialimmunosuppressant - calcineurin inhibitor: cyclosporine A (CsA)immunosuppressant - fusion proteins and monoclonal antibodies: belataceptkidney transplantation/nephrology

Identifiers

PMID29573335
PMCPMC6055813
OpenAlexW2790094382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.