Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29573248›Full record

ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2018

Comparison between Newly Developed and Commercial Inhalant Skin Prick Test Reagents Using In Vivo and In Vitro Methods.

Sang Chul Lee, Da Woon Sim, Jongsun Lee, Kyoung Yong Jeong, Kyung Hee Park, Jae Hyun Lee, Jung Dong Kim, Jung Won Park

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Stability of extracts from pollens of allergenic importance in Korea.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sang Chul LeeDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5318-6804
Da Woon SimDivision of Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9723-0720
Jongsun LeeInstitute of Allergy, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1526-2241
Kyoung Yong JeongInstitute of Allergy, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9887-1426
Kyung Hee ParkDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3605-5364
Jae Hyun LeeDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0760-0071
Jung Dong KimProlagen, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6348-9267
Jung Won ParkDivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0249-8749
Yonsei University · KRChonnam National University · KRKraftanlagen (Germany) · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe developed skin prick test (SPT) reagents for common inhalant allergens that reflected the real exposure in Korea. The study aim was to evaluate diagnostic usefulness and allergen potency of our inhalant SPT reagents in comparison with commercial products.

methodsWe produced eight common inhalant allergen SPT reagents using total extract (Prolagen): Dermatophagoides farinae, Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, oak, ragweed, mugwort, Humulus japonicus pollens, as well as cat and dog allergens. We compared the newly developed reagents with three commercially available SPT reagents (Allergopharma, Hollister-Stier, Lofarma). We measured total protein concentrations, sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), major allergen concentration, and biological allergen potencies measured by immunoglobulin E (IgE) immunoblotting and ImmunoCAP inhibition test.

resultsDiagnostic values of these SPT reagents were expressed as positivity rate and concordance rate of the results from ImmunoCAP allergen-specific IgE test in 94 allergic patients. In vitro analysis showed marked differences in protein concentrations, SDS-PAGE features, major allergen concentrations, and biological allergen potencies of four different SPT reagents. In vivo analysis showed that positive rates and concordance rates of Prolagen® SPT reagents were similar compared to the three commercial SPT reagents.

conclusionThe newly developed Prolagen® inhalant SPT reagents are not inferior to the commercially available SPT reagents in allergy diagnosis.

Indexed as

AdultAllergensDouble-Blind MethodElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansHypersensitivityImmunoglobulin EMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesReagent Kits, DiagnosticSkin TestsAllergensImmunoglobulin EReagent Kits, DiagnosticAllergensAllergy and ImmunologyDiagnosisSkin Prick Test

Identifiers

PMID29573248
PMCPMC5865053
OpenAlexW2789274747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.