Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29572749›Full record

ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2018

Eculizumab treatment in severe pediatric STEC-HUS: a multicenter retrospective study.

Lucas Percheron, Raluca Gramada, Stéphanie Tellier, Remi Salomon, Jérôme Harambat, Brigitte Llanas, Marc Fila, Emma Allain-Launay, Anne-Laure Lapeyraque, Valerie Leroy and 11 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Shiga Toxin-ProducingKidney international reports · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. The Benefits of Complement Measurements for the Clinical Practice.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 17 institutions in 3 countries.

Lucas PercheronService de Néphrologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital des enfants, CHU Purpan, Toulouse, France. percheron.l@chu-toulouse.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-2501-0462
Raluca GramadaService de Neuroradiologie Diagnostique et Thérapeutique, CHU Purpan, Toulouse, France.
Stéphanie TellierService de Néphrologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital des enfants, CHU Purpan, Toulouse, France.
Remi SalomonService de Néphrologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Jérôme HarambatService de Néphrologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital Pellegrin-Enfants, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Brigitte LlanasService de Néphrologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital Pellegrin-Enfants, CHU Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.
Marc FilaService de Néphrologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital Robert Debré-Paris, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Emma Allain-LaunayService de Néphrologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital Mère-Enfants, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.
Anne-Laure LapeyraqueService de Néphrologie Pédiatrique, CHU de Sainte-Justine à Montréal Canada, Montréal, Canada.
Valerie LeroyService de Néphrologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, CHU Lille, Lille, France.
Anne-Laure AdraService de Néphrologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, CHU Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Etienne BérardService de Néphrologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital Archet 2, CHU Nice, Nice, France.
Guylhène Bourdat-MichelService de pédiatrie, Hôpital Couple-Enfants, CHU Grenoble, Grenoble, France.
Hassid ChehadeService de Néphrologie Pédiatrique, CHU de Lausanne Suisse, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Philippe EckartService de Pédiatrie Médicale, Hôpital côte de nacre, CHU Caen, Caen, France.
Elodie MerieauService de Néphrologie, Hôpital Clocheville, CHU Tours, Tours, France.
Christine PiètrementService de Pédiatrie, Hôpital Américain, CHU Reims, Reims, France.
Anne-Laure Sellier-LeclercService de Néphrologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital femme mère enfant, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Véronique Frémeaux-BacchiLaboratoire d'immunologie, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.
Chloe DimeglioBiostatistiques, Informatique Médicale, UMR 1027 Inserm, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.
Arnaud GarnierService de Néphrologie Pédiatrique, Hôpital des enfants, CHU Purpan, Toulouse, France. garnier.a@chu-toulouse.fr.
Hôpital Purpan · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRHôpital Pellegrin · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen Normandie · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine · CAHôpital américain de paris · FRHôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve · FRHôpital des Enfants · FRHôpital l'Archet · FRHôpital Mère-Enfant · FRHôpital Necker-Enfants Malades · FRHôpital Orthopédique de la Suisse Romande · CHHospices Civils de Lyon · FRUniversité Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHemolytic uremic syndrome related to Shiga-toxin-secreting Escherichia coli infection (STEC-HUS) remains a common cause of acute kidney injury in young children. No specific treatment has been validated for this severe disease. Recently, experimental studies highlight the potential role of complement in STEC-HUS pathophysiology. Eculizumab (EC), a monoclonal antibody against terminal complement complex, has been used in severe STEC-HUS patients, mostly during the 2011 German outbreak, with conflicting results.

methodsOn behalf of the French Society of Pediatric Nephrology, we retrospectively studied 33 children from 15 centers treated with EC for severe STEC-HUS. Indication for EC was neurologic involvement in 20 patients, cardiac and neurologic involvement in 8, cardiac involvement in 2, and digestive involvement in 3. Based on medical status at last follow-up, patients were divided into two groups: favorable (n = 15) and unfavorable outcomes (n = 18).

resultsAmong patients with favorable outcome, 11/14 patients (79%) displayed persistent blockade of complement activity before each EC reinjection. Conversely, in patients with unfavorable outcome, only 9/15 (53%) had persistent blockade (p = n.s.). Among 28 patients presenting neurological symptoms, 19 had favorable neurological outcome including 17 with prompt recovery following first EC injection. Only two adverse effects potentially related to EC treatment were reported.

conclusionsTaken together, these results may support EC use in severe STEC-HUS patients, especially those presenting severe neurological symptoms. The study, however, is limited by absence of a control group and use of multiple therapeutic interventions in treatment groups. Thus, prospective, controlled trials should be undertaken.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedChildChild, PreschoolComplement ActivationComplement C5Complement Inactivating AgentsEscherichia coli InfectionsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHemolytic-Uremic SyndromeHumansInfantMaleRetrospective StudiesSeverity of Illness IndexAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedComplement C5Complement Inactivating AgentseculizumabAcute kidney injuryComplementHemolytic uremic syndromePediatric

Identifiers

PMID29572749
OpenAlexW2791408421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.