Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29572710›Full record

SynthesisEndocrine2018

Liquid L-thyroxine versus tablet L-thyroxine in patients on L- thyroxine replacement or suppressive therapy: a meta-analysis.

Irakoze Laurent, Siying Tang, Manirakiza Astère, Kan Ran Wang, Shuhua Deng, Ling Xiao, Qi Fu Li

Abstract readComparative StudyMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Endocrine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Hypothyroidism.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. L-T4 Therapy in Enteric Malabsorptive Disorders.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Irakoze LaurentDepartment of Endocrinology, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Siying TangDepartment of Endocrinology, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Manirakiza AstèreDepartment of Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Kan Ran WangDepartment of Endocrinology, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Shuhua DengDepartment of Endocrinology, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Ling XiaoDepartment of Nursing, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Qi Fu LiDepartment of Endocrinology, First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China. liqifu@yeah.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7249-6445
The Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University · CNRepublic of Burundi · BI

Funding

Chongqing Science and Technology Committee Innovation Project, Technology Development and Application of Precision Medicine cstc2016shms-ztzx1003Fundamental Science and Advanced Technology Research of Chongqing Major Project cstc2015jcyjBX0096National Natural Science Foundation of China Grants 81370954, 81670785
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the effectiveness of liquid L-T4 (L-thyroxine) and tablet L-T4 in patients on L-T4 replacement or suppressive therapy.

methodsThe Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify relevant articles. All prospective or randomized controlled studies (RCTs) comparing liquid L-T4 and tablet L-T4 in patients on L-T4 replacement or suppressive therapy were included in the analysis.

resultsOverall, the initial search of the four databases identified 1278 published studies; of these, eight studies were ultimately included in the meta-analysis. TSH (thyroid stimulating hormone) levels were significantly suppressed in patients on liquid L-T4 compared with those on tablet L-T4, in patients on L-T4 suppressive therapy with L-T4 malabsorption (Mean Difference (MD) = -2.26, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): -3.59, -0.93; P = 0.0009)). However, liquid L-T4 and tablet L-T4 did not show a statistically significant difference in patients on L-T4 suppressive therapy without malabsorption (MD = 0.08, 95% CI: -0.31, 0.47; P = 0.69). TSH levels were significantly normalized in patients on liquid L-T4 compared with those on tablet L-T4, in Patients on L-T4 replacement therapy with L-T4 malabsorption (MD = -3.20, 95% CI: -5.08, -1.32; P = 0.0009). However, liquid L-T4 and tablet L-T4 did not show a statistically significant difference in patients on L-T4 replacement therapy without malabsorption (MD = 0.91, 95% CI: -0.03, 1.86; P = 0.06).

conclusionLiquid L-T4 is more efficient than tablet L-T4 in patients on L-T4 replacement or suppressive therapy with malabsorption. No significant differences were observed in patients without malabsorption. Further studies should be conducted to verify these findings.

Indexed as

Hormone Replacement TherapyHumansMalabsorption SyndromesPharmaceutical SolutionsTabletsThyroxinePharmaceutical SolutionsTabletsThyroxineHypothyroidismLiquid L-thyroxineMeta-analysisTablet L-thyroxineThyroid cancer

Identifiers

PMID29572710
OpenAlexW2792790125

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.