Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29572669›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2018

Good glycaemic control is associated with a better prognosis in breast cancer patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Yen-Lin Chang, Wayne Huey-Herng Sheu, Shih-Yi Lin, Wen-Shyong Liou

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. HbABMC cancer · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Influence of Hyperglycemia on the Prognosis of Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yen-Lin ChangDepartment of Pharmacy, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, 1650 Taiwan Boulevard Sect. 4, Taichung, 40705, Taiwan, ROC.
Wayne Huey-Herng SheuDivision of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC.
Shih-Yi LinCenter for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, ROC.
Wen-Shyong LiouDepartment of Pharmacy, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, 1650 Taiwan Boulevard Sect. 4, Taichung, 40705, Taiwan, ROC. wlswlsgod@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5103-5965
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWChina Medical University · TWTaichung Veterans General Hospital · TW

Funding

Taichung Veterans General Hospital TCVGH-1056103B
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the risk factors associated with increased breast cancer (BC) mortality, the effects of glycaemic control on the prognosis of BC have not been thoroughly evaluated. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the relationship between glycaemic control and BC prognosis and to determine an optimal target of glycaemic control for BC patients with diabetes. We included 2812 stage 0-3 BC women, of whom 145 were diabetic and were 2667 non-diabetic. In those with diabetes, a mean haemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) < 7% (n = 77) was defined as well-controlled diabetes, while a mean HbA1C > 9% (n = 16) was defined as poorly controlled diabetes. All of the BC populations were followed from the date on which BC was diagnosed until 31 December 2015. Cox regression analysis was performed to estimate the adjusted hazards for all-cause mortality and BC-specific mortality. After controlling for the baseline and BC-related confounders, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality and the HR for BC-specific mortality were 3.65 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.13-11.82) and 8.37 (95% CI 1.90-36.91), respectively, for poorly controlled diabetic women and non-DM women. However, for the diabetic women with good glycaemic control, the HRs of all-cause mortality and BC-specific mortality were not significantly different (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.42-1.01; HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.18-3.32, respectively) from those for both mortalities in non-DM patients. For moderate controlled diabetic women, the HRs for all-cause mortality and BC-specific mortality were 1.95 (95% CI 0.89-4.27) and 3.55 (95% CI 1.369-9.30), respectively. This pilot and retrospective cohort study reveals a relationship between glycaemic control and BC prognosis in diabetic women. In addition, well-controlled HbA1C, with maintained mean HbA1C values under 7%, may be associated with a better progression outcome of BC.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsBlood GlucoseBreast NeoplasmsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsAntineoplastic AgentsBlood GlucoseGlycated Hemoglobinhemoglobin A1c protein, humanHypoglycemic AgentsBreast cancerDiabetes mellitusHaemoglobin A1CMortality

Identifiers

PMID29572669
OpenAlexW2793336561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.