ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2018
Good glycaemic control is associated with a better prognosis in breast cancer patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of diabetes and glycemic control during cancer care on mortality in non-metastatic solid and hematologic malignancies.Annals of medicine · 2025Article
- Anti-diabetic medications and cancer: links beyond glycemic and body weight control.Precision clinical medicine · 2025Review
- HbABMC cancer · 2025Article
- Using routinely collected patient data to study the impact of type 2 diabetes on breast cancer.Endocrine oncology (Bristol, England) · 2025Article
- Glycemic control and cancer outcomes in oncologic patients with diabetes: an Italian Association of Medical Oncology (AIOM), Italian Association of Medical Diabetologists (AMD), Italian Society of Diabetology (SID), Italian Society of Endocrinology (SIE), Italian Society of Pharmacology (SIF) multidisciplinary critical view.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2024Review
- Glycemic control in diabetic patients improved overall lung cancer survival across diverse populations.JNCI cancer spectrum · 2024Article
- Impact of Breast Cancer on Cardiometabolic Health in Spanish Women ≥50 Years with Pre-Existing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Cancers · 2024Article
- Association between glucose levels and all-cause mortality in cancer survivors: findings from NHANES 1999-2018.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Association of dietary sodium intake with impaired fasting glucose in adult cancer survivors: A population-based cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2023Article
- Impact of Diabetes on Patient Outcomes in Breast Cancer Patients.Breast care (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The Effects of Diabetes and Glycemic Control on Cancer Outcomes in Individuals With Metastatic Breast Cancer.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2022Article
- Glycemic control was associated with nonprostate cancer and overall mortalities in diabetic patients with prostate cancer.Journal of the Chinese Medical Association : JCMA · 2022Article
- Influence of Hyperglycemia on the Prognosis of Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2022Article
- Patterns of chronic disease management and health outcomes in a population-based cohort of Black women with breast cancer.Cancer causes & control : CCC · 2021Article
- The Survival Benefit for Optimal Glycemic Control in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients With Preexisting Diabetes Mellitus.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Article
- Epidemiological characteristics of and risk factors for breast cancer in the world.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2019Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Although diabetes mellitus (DM) is one of the risk factors associated with increased breast cancer (BC) mortality, the effects of glycaemic control on the prognosis of BC have not been thoroughly evaluated. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the relationship between glycaemic control and BC prognosis and to determine an optimal target of glycaemic control for BC patients with diabetes. We included 2812 stage 0-3 BC women, of whom 145 were diabetic and were 2667 non-diabetic. In those with diabetes, a mean haemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) < 7% (n = 77) was defined as well-controlled diabetes, while a mean HbA1C > 9% (n = 16) was defined as poorly controlled diabetes. All of the BC populations were followed from the date on which BC was diagnosed until 31 December 2015. Cox regression analysis was performed to estimate the adjusted hazards for all-cause mortality and BC-specific mortality. After controlling for the baseline and BC-related confounders, the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality and the HR for BC-specific mortality were 3.65 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.13-11.82) and 8.37 (95% CI 1.90-36.91), respectively, for poorly controlled diabetic women and non-DM women. However, for the diabetic women with good glycaemic control, the HRs of all-cause mortality and BC-specific mortality were not significantly different (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.42-1.01; HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.18-3.32, respectively) from those for both mortalities in non-DM patients. For moderate controlled diabetic women, the HRs for all-cause mortality and BC-specific mortality were 1.95 (95% CI 0.89-4.27) and 3.55 (95% CI 1.369-9.30), respectively. This pilot and retrospective cohort study reveals a relationship between glycaemic control and BC prognosis in diabetic women. In addition, well-controlled HbA1C, with maintained mean HbA1C values under 7%, may be associated with a better progression outcome of BC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.