Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29572662›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacokinetics2018

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Amikacin in Pediatric Patients: A Comprehensive Review of Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses.

Sílvia M Illamola, Catherine M Sherwin, J G Coen van Hasselt

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Population Pharmacokinetics of Amikacin in Non-Neonatal Pediatric Patients: A Scoping Review.European journal of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Antioxidative and Anti-Inflammatory Protective Effects ofOxidative medicine and cellular longevity · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Sílvia M IllamolaDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, 295 Chipeta Way 1S100, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA. 07silvia@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3245-1626
Catherine M SherwinDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Utah School of Medicine, 295 Chipeta Way 1S100, Salt Lake City, UT, 84108, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0844-3207
J G Coen van HasseltDivision of Systems Biomedicine and Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1664-7314
Leiden University · NLUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amikacin plays a key role in the treatment of severe hospital-acquired infections with Gram-negative bacteria. Therapeutic use of amikacin is challenged by high inter-individual variability (IIV) combined with a narrow therapeutic spectrum. Pediatric patients represent a particularly fragile population where adequate dosing is crucial yet challenging to achieve due significant IIV associated with developmental processes and other factors. The current review provides an overview of parametric population pharmacokinetic analyses of amikacin in pediatric patients and associated patient-specific determinants of IIV. We searched PubMed for parametric population pharmacokinetic analyses of amikacin in pediatric patients. Information on patient population, study design, pharmacokinetic model characteristics, and identified patient-specific predictors of IIV was collected. Comparative analyses across studies were conducted to characterize quantitative differences reported for different studies and patient populations. Eight eligible publications were identified, of which six analyses involved neonates up to 3 months of age and two studies investigated older pediatric patients (age 2-17 years). Most commonly included covariates were current body weight for both clearance and volume of distribution, followed by age-related covariates on clearance in neonatal studies (four of six models). Quantitative comparisons of different models reported generally showed similar developmental effects in neonatal populations. The present review provides a comprehensive overview of parametric population pharmacokinetic studies for amikacin. Future studies could address the knowledge gap of patients between 3 months and 2 years of age. Furthermore, systematic studies of additional potential predictors for IIV (e.g., sepsis, inflammatory markers, renal function biomarkers) could be of relevance to address the significant IIV remaining after inclusion of the most commonly identified covariates.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalAdolescentAge FactorsAmikacinAnti-Bacterial AgentsBody WeightChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantMetabolic Clearance RateTissue DistributionAmikacinAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID29572662
OpenAlexW2792268365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.