Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29572637›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2018

Observer variability of reference tissue selection for relativecerebral blood volume measurements in glioma patients.

Marcel T H Oei, Frederick J A Meijer, Jan-Jurre Mordang, Ewoud J Smit, Albert J S Idema, Bozena M Goraj, Hendrik O A Laue, Mathias Prokop, Rashindra Manniesing

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evaluation of [Journal of clinical medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Reliability of dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion metrics in pre- and post-treatment glioma.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marcel T H OeiDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboudumc, Geert Grooteplein 10, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. mthoei@gmail.com.
Frederick J A MeijerDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboudumc, Geert Grooteplein 10, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jan-Jurre MordangDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboudumc, Geert Grooteplein 10, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ewoud J SmitDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboudumc, Geert Grooteplein 10, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Albert J S IdemaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Radboudumc, Geert Grooteplein 10, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Bozena M GorajDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboudumc, Geert Grooteplein 10, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Hendrik O A LaueFraunhofer MEVIS, Universitätsallee 29, 28359, Bremen, Germany.
Mathias ProkopDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboudumc, Geert Grooteplein 10, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Rashindra ManniesingDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Radboudumc, Geert Grooteplein 10, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess observer variability of different reference tissues used for relative CBV (rCBV) measurements in DSC-MRI of glioma patients.

methodsIn this retrospective study, three observers measured rCBV in DSC-MR images of 44 glioma patients on two occasions. rCBV is calculated by the CBV in the tumour hotspot/the CBV of a reference tissue at the contralateral side for normalization. One observer annotated the tumour hotspot that was kept constant for all measurements. All observers annotated eight reference tissues of normal white and grey matter. Observer variability was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), coefficient of variation (CV) and Bland-Altman analyses.

resultsFor intra-observer, the ICC ranged from 0.50-0.97 (fair-excellent) for all reference tissues. The CV ranged from 5.1-22.1 % for all reference tissues and observers. For inter-observer, the ICC for all pairwise observer combinations ranged from 0.44-0.92 (poor-excellent). The CV ranged from 8.1-31.1 %. Centrum semiovale was the only reference tissue that showed excellent intra- and inter-observer agreement (ICC>0.85) and lowest CVs (<12.5 %). Bland-Altman analyses showed that mean differences for centrum semiovale were close to zero.

conclusionSelecting contralateral centrum semiovale as reference tissue for rCBV provides the lowest observer variability. KEY POINTS: • Reference tissue selection for rCBV measurements adds variability to rCBV measurements. • rCBV measurements vary depending on the choice of reference tissue. • Observer variability of reference tissue selection varies between poor and excellent. • Centrum semiovale as reference tissue for rCBV provides the lowest observer variability.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBlood Volume DeterminationBrain NeoplasmsContrast MediaFemaleGliomaGray MatterHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationReference ValuesRetrospective StudiesWhite MatterContrast MediaCerebral blood volumeGliomaMagnetic resonance angiographyObserver variationPerfusion imaging

Identifiers

PMID29572637
PMCPMC6096614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.