ArticleScientific reports2018
Non-invasive quantification of human swallowing using a simple motion tracking system.
Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Surface Electromyography for Evaluating the Effect of Aging on the Coordination of Swallowing Muscles.Dysphagia · 2023Article
- Gustatory stimulus interventions for older adults with dysphagia: a scoping review.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2023Article
- Article
- FEASIBILITY STUDY ON SWALLOWING TELEREHABILITATION IN PATIENTS WITH CORONAVIRUS DISEASE 2019.Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications · 2023Article
- Swallow Detection with Acoustics and Accelerometric-Based Wearable Technology: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Singing Experience Influences RSST Scores.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Motor and sensory cortical processing of neural oscillatory activities revealed by human swallowing using intracranial electrodes.iScience · 2021Article
- Swallowing-related neural oscillation: an intracranial EEG study.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2021Article
- The Swallowing Characteristics of Thickeners, Jellies and Yoghurt Observed Using an In Vitro Model.Dysphagia · 2020Article
- Thyroid cartilage loci and hyoid bone analysis using a video fluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS).Medicine · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The number of patients with dysphagia is rapidly increasing due to the ageing of the population. Therefore, the importance of objectively assessing swallowing function has received increasing attention. Videofluoroscopy and videoendoscopy are the standard clinical examinations for dysphagia, but these techniques are not suitable for daily use because of their invasiveness. Here, we aimed to develop a novel, non-invasive method for measuring swallowing function using a motion tracking system, the Kinect v2 sensor. Five males and five females with normal swallowing function participated in this study. We defined three mouth-related parameters and two larynx-related parameters and recorded data from 2.5 seconds before to 2.5 seconds after swallowing onset. Changes in mouth-related parameters were observed before swallowing and reached peak values at the time of swallowing. In contrast, larynx-related parameters showed little change before swallowing and reached peak values immediately after swallowing. This simple swallow tracking system (SSTS) successfully quantified the swallowing process from the oral phase to the laryngeal phase. This SSTS is non-invasive, wireless, easy to set up, and simultaneously measures the dynamics of swallowing from the mouth to the larynx. We propose the SSTS for use as a novel and non-invasive swallowing assessment tool in the clinic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.