Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29572469›Full record

ArticleHeredity2018

A new hybrid approach for MHC genotyping: high-throughput NGS and long read MinION nanopore sequencing, with application to the non-model vertebrate Alpine chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra).

S Fuselli, R P Baptista, A Panziera, A Magi, S Guglielmi, R Tonin, A Benazzo, L G Bauzer, C J Mazzoni, G Bertorelle

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Discriminating Clonotypes of Influenza A Virus Genes by Nanopore Sequencing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. MHC Genotyping by SSCP and Amplicon-Based NGS Approach in Chamois.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

S FuselliDepartment of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, University of Ferrara, Via L. Borsari 46, Ferrara, 44121, Italy. fss@unife.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1442-6171
R P BaptistaCenter for Tropical & Emerging Global Diseases, University of Georgia, 107 Paul D. Coverdell Center, 500 D. W. Brooks Drive, Athens, GA, 30602-7394, USA.
A PanzieraDepartment of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, University of Ferrara, Via L. Borsari 46, Ferrara, 44121, Italy.
A MagiDepartment of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla, Florence, 3-50134, Italy.
S GuglielmiDepartment of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, University of Ferrara, Via L. Borsari 46, Ferrara, 44121, Italy.
R ToninDepartment of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, University of Ferrara, Via L. Borsari 46, Ferrara, 44121, Italy.
A BenazzoDepartment of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, University of Ferrara, Via L. Borsari 46, Ferrara, 44121, Italy.
L G BauzerLaboratório de Fisiologia e Controle de Artrópodes Vetores, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
C J MazzoniBerlin Center for Genomics in Biodiversity Research, Königin-Luise-Str. 6-8, Berlin, 14195, Germany.
G BertorelleDepartment of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, University of Ferrara, Via L. Borsari 46, Ferrara, 44121, Italy.
University of Ferrara · ITBerlin Center for Genomics in Biodiversity Research · DEFondazione Edmund Mach · ITFree University of Bozen-Bolzano · ITUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The major histocompatibility complex (MHC) acts as an interface between the immune system and infectious diseases. Accurate characterization and genotyping of the extremely variable MHC loci are challenging especially without a reference sequence. We designed a combination of long-range PCR, Illumina short-reads, and Oxford Nanopore MinION long-reads approaches to capture the genetic variation of the MHC II DRB locus in an Italian population of the Alpine chamois (Rupicapra rupicapra). We utilized long-range PCR to generate a 9 Kb fragment of the DRB locus. Amplicons from six different individuals were fragmented, tagged, and simultaneously sequenced with Illumina MiSeq. One of these amplicons was sequenced with the MinION device, which produced long reads covering the entire amplified fragment. A pipeline that combines short and long reads resolved several short tandem repeats and homopolymers and produced a de novo reference, which was then used to map and genotype the short reads from all individuals. The assembled DRB locus showed a high level of polymorphism and the presence of a recombination breakpoint. Our results suggest that an amplicon-based NGS approach coupled with single-molecule MinION nanopore sequencing can efficiently achieve both the assembly and the genotyping of complex genomic regions in multiple individuals in the absence of a reference sequence.

Indexed as

AllelesAnimalsComputational BiologyExonsGenes, MHC Class IIGenomicsHaplotypesHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHistocompatibility TestingMajor Histocompatibility ComplexPolymerase Chain ReactionPolymorphism, GeneticRecombination, GeneticRupicapraSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID29572469
PMCPMC6133961
OpenAlexW2795828626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.