Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29572453›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Floral resource partitioning by individuals within generalised hoverfly pollination networks revealed by DNA metabarcoding.

Andrew Lucas, Owen Bodger, Berry J Brosi, Col R Ford, Dan W Forman, Carolyn Greig, Matthew Hegarty, Laura Jones, Penelope J Neyland, Natasha de Vere

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
14.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Seed mixes of intermediate grass:forb ratio create vegetation of greater ecosystem service provision in restorations.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Andrew LucasDepartment of Biosciences, College of Science, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP, Wales, UK. 599841@swansea.ac.uk.
Owen BodgerInstitute of Life Science, School of Medicine, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP, Wales, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4022-9964
Berry J BrosiDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Emory University, 400 Dowman Drive NE, Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9233-1151
Col R FordNational Botanic Garden of Wales, Llanarthne, Carmarthenshire, Wales, SA32 8HG, UK.
Dan W FormanDepartment of Biosciences, College of Science, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP, Wales, UK.
Carolyn GreigInstitute of Life Science, School of Medicine, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP, Wales, UK.
Matthew HegartyInstitute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Aberystwyth, SY23 3EE, Wales, UK.
Laura JonesNational Botanic Garden of Wales, Llanarthne, Carmarthenshire, Wales, SA32 8HG, UK.
Penelope J NeylandDepartment of Biosciences, College of Science, Swansea University, Singleton Park, Swansea, SA2 8PP, Wales, UK.
Natasha de VereNational Botanic Garden of Wales, Llanarthne, Carmarthenshire, Wales, SA32 8HG, UK.
Swansea University · GBAberystwyth University · GBNational Botanic Garden of Wales · GBEmory University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pollination is a key ecosystem service for agriculture and wider ecosystem function. However, most pollination studies focus on Hymenoptera, with hoverflies (Syrphidae) frequently treated as a single functional group. We tested this assumption by investigating pollen carried by eleven species of hoverfly in five genera, Cheilosia, Eristalis, Rhingia, Sericomyia and Volucella, using DNA metabarcoding. Hoverflies carried pollen from 59 plant taxa, suggesting they visit a wider number of plant species than previously appreciated. Most pollen recorded came from plant taxa frequently found at our study sites, predominantly Apiaceae, Cardueae, Calluna vulgaris, Rubus fruticosus agg., and Succisa pratensis, with hoverflies transporting pollen from 40% of entomophilous plant species present. Overall pollen transport network structures were generalised, similar to other pollination networks elsewhere. All hoverfly species were also generalised with few exclusive plant/hoverfly interactions. However, using the Jaccard Index, we found significant differences in the relative composition of pollen loads between hoverfly genera, except for Volucella, demonstrating some degree of functional complementarity. Eristalis and Sericomyia species had significant differences in relative pollen load composition compared to congeners. Our results demonstrate the range of pollens transported by hoverflies and the potential pollination function undertaken within this ecologically and morphologically diverse guild.

Indexed as

DipteraDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicEcosystemFlowersPollinationAnimals

Identifiers

PMID29572453
PMCPMC5865107
OpenAlexW2791187584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.