Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29571973›Full record

ArticleVaccine2018

Options for design of real-world impact studies of single-dose vaccine schedules.

Silvia Franceschi, Gary M Clifford, Iacopo Baussano

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Silvia FranceschiCancer Epidemiology Unit, Aviano National Cancer Institute IRCCS, Via Franco Gallini 2, 33081 Aviano (PN), Italy. Electronic address: silvia.franceschi@cro.it.
Gary M CliffordInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, 150 cours Albert Thomas, 69372 Lyon Cedex 08, France. Electronic address: cliffordg@iarc.fr.
Iacopo BaussanoInternational Agency for Research on Cancer, 150 cours Albert Thomas, 69372 Lyon Cedex 08, France. Electronic address: baussanoi@iarc.fr.
Centre International de Recherche sur le Cancer · FRCentro di Riferimento Oncologico · IT

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Based on existing evidence for efficacy, savings, and advantages in delivery, some countries may elect to pilot or roll out single-dose human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination (instead of, or in combination with, two-dose) in advance of a WHO policy decision. Accelerated evidence of population-based effectiveness (hereafter referred to as overall effectiveness, OE) of one-dose vaccine programs could be gained through regular surveys of HPV prevalence in young women before and after vaccination introduction. In order to offer the earliest information on OE, one-dose HPV vaccination should target one or more birth cohorts as close as possible to the age when sexual activity most often starts in a given population. A catch-up one-dose vaccination program of girls up to 18 years of age who would have been too old to profit from the introduction of a routine HPV vaccination program in preadolescents would minimize the interval between vaccination and the possibility to monitor vaccination impact in young women. In addition, catch-up is especially desirable in low- and middle-income countries with little access to screening as "missed" cohorts may face high risk of cervical cancer death. HPV prevalence should be firstly monitored in age groups of women who may already be sexually active but still reluctant to admit it and to accept vaginal examination for the collection of cervical cells. Hence, HPV testing from urine samples, for which good concordance with cervical cells has been proven, offers a feasible approach to assess periodically vaccine OE in representative samples of 17-20 year-old women. This type of observational study would greatly benefit from the presence of a population census and the creation of a vaccination registry. A real-world demonstration of OE of the new schedule would complement the findings of ongoing clinical trials and immunogenicity studies on the efficacy of single-dose HPV vaccination.

Indexed as

Immunization ScheduleAdolescentChildClinical Trials as TopicDeveloping CountriesFemaleHumansMass VaccinationPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesPrevalenceRisk FactorsSurveys and QuestionnairesTreatment OutcomeUterine Cervical NeoplasmsYoung AdultPapillomavirus VaccinesCervical cancerEffectivenessHuman papillomavirusLow- and middle- income countriesSingle-doseVaccination

Identifiers

PMID29571973
PMCPMC6066174
OpenAlexW2793812449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.