ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2018
Repeatability, reproducibility, and accuracy of quantitative mri of the breast in the community radiology setting.
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diffusion tensor imaging and diffusion kurtosis imaging of the pancreas - feasibility, robustness and protocol comparison in a healthy population.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Quantitative evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficient in a large multi-unit institution.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2025Article
- B1 corrected T1 mapping in the differentiation and prediction of breast cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Repeatability-encouraging self-supervised learning reconstruction for quantitative MRI.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Quantitative [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025Article
- The QIBA Profile for Diffusion-Weighted MRI: Apparent Diffusion Coefficient as a Quantitative Imaging Biomarker.Radiology · 2024Review
- Phantoms for Quantitative Body MRI: a review and discussion of the phantom value.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Review
- Systematic evaluation of MRI-based characterization of tumor-associated vascular morphology and hemodynamics via a dynamic digital phantom.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024Article
- Stability and repeatability of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of normal pancreas on 5.0 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Analysis of simplicial complexes to determine when to sample for quantitative DCE MRI of the breast.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2023Article
- Bias, Repeatability and Reproducibility of Liver TJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2022Observational
- MRI-Based Digital Models Forecast Patient-Specific Treatment Responses to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.Cancer research · 2022Article
- Repeatability and Reproducibility Assessment of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in the Prostate: A Trial of the ECOG-ACRIN Research Group (ACRIN 6701).Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2022Article
- Quantifying Tumor Heterogeneity via MRI Habitats to Characterize Microenvironmental Alterations in HER2+ Breast Cancer.Cancers · 2022Article
- Challenges in ensuring the generalizability of image quantitation methods for MRI.Medical physics · 2022Review
- Impact of AlternateTomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2022Article
- Diffusion Breast MRI: Current Standard and Emerging Techniques.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
- Quantitative multiparametric MRI predicts response to neoadjuvant therapy in the community setting.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundQuantitative diffusion-weighted MRI (DW-MRI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) have the potential to impact patient care by providing noninvasive biological information in breast cancer. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: To quantify the repeatability, reproducibility, and accuracy of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and T STUDY TYPE: Prospective. SUBJECTS/PHANTOM: Ice-water DW-MRI and T FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3T Siemens Skyra MRI quantitative DW-MRI and T ASSESSMENT: Quantitative DW-MRI and T STATISTICAL TESTS: Average values of breast tissue were quantified and Bland-Altman analysis was performed to assess the repeatability of the MRI techniques, while the Friedman test assessed reproducibility.
resultsADC measurements were reproducible across sites, with an average difference of 1.6% in an ice-water phantom and 7.0% in breast fibroglandular tissue. T DATA
conclusionCommunity radiology practices can perform repeatable, reproducible, and accurate quantitative T LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.