Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29570534›Full record

ArticleMedicine and science in sports and exercise2018

Neuromuscular Adaptations to Work-matched Maximal Eccentric versus Concentric Training.

Sumiaki Maeo, Xiyao Shan, Shun Otsuka, Hiroaki Kanehisa, Yasuo Kawakami

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Effects of Postural Conditions During Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Thigh Muscle Size.Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sumiaki MaeoFaculty of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, Tokorozawa, Saitama, JAPAN.
Xiyao ShanFaculty of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, Tokorozawa, Saitama, JAPAN.
Shun OtsukaFaculty of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, Tokorozawa, Saitama, JAPAN.
Hiroaki KanehisaDepartment of Sports and Life Science, National Institute of Fitness and Sports in Kanoya, Kanoya, Kagoshima, JAPAN.
Yasuo KawakamiFaculty of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, Tokorozawa, Saitama, JAPAN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is unclear whether the superiority of eccentric over concentric training on neuromuscular improvements is due to higher torque (mechanical loading) achievable during eccentric contractions or due to resulting greater total work. PURPOSE: This study aimed to examine neuromuscular adaptations after maximal eccentric versus concentric training matched for total work.

methodsTwelve males conducted single-joint isokinetic (180°·s) maximal eccentric contractions of the knee extensors in one leg (ECC-leg) and concentric in the other (CON-leg), 6 sets per session (3-5 sets in the initial 1-3 sessions), 2 sessions per week for 10 wk. The preceding leg performed 10 repetitions per set. The following leg conducted the equivalent volume of work. In addition to peak torque during training, agonist EMG and MRI-based anatomical cross-sectional area (ACSA) and transverse relaxation time (T2) at midthigh as reflective of neural drive, hypertrophy, and edema, respectively, were assessed weekly throughout the training period and pre- and posttraining. Whole muscle volume was also measured pre- and posttraining.

resultsTorque and EMG (in trained contraction conditions) significantly increased in both legs after week 1 (W1) and week 4 (W4), respectively, with a greater degree for ECC-leg (torque +76%, EMG +73%: posttraining) than CON-leg (+28%, +20%). ACSA significantly increased after W4 in ECC-leg only (+4%: posttraining), without T2 changes throughout. Muscle volume also increased in ECC-leg only (+4%). Multiple regression analysis revealed that changes (%Δ) in EMG solely explained 53%-80% and 30%-56% of the total variance in %Δtorque through training in ECC-leg and CON-leg, respectively, with small contributions (+13%-18%) of %ΔACSA for both legs.

conclusionEccentric training induces greater neuromuscular changes than concentric training even when matched for total work, whereas most of the strength gains during 10-wk training are attributable to the increased neural drive.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAdultEdemaElectromyographyHumansKneeMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthNeuromuscular JunctionResistance TrainingTorqueYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID29570534
PMCPMC6072384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.