Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29569944›Full record

ArticleJournal of athletic training2018

Shoulder Taping and Neuromuscular Control.

Suzanne J Snodgrass, Scott F Farrell, Henry Tsao, Peter G Osmotherly, Darren A Rivett, Lucy S Chipchase, Siobhan M Schabrun

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of athletic training, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Rehabilitation and Return to Sport of Female Athletes.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Suzanne J SnodgrassSchool of Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Scott F FarrellSchool of Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Henry TsaoEmergency Department, Caboolture Hospital, Australia.
Peter G OsmotherlySchool of Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Darren A RivettSchool of Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
Lucy S ChipchaseBrain Rehabilitation and Neuroplasticity Unit, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, Australia.
Siobhan M SchabrunBrain Rehabilitation and Neuroplasticity Unit, Western Sydney University, Campbelltown, Australia.
University of Newcastle Australia · AUWestern Sydney University · AUGriffith University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextScapular taping can offer clinical benefit to some patients with shoulder pain; however, the underlying mechanisms are unclear. Understanding these mechanisms may guide the development of treatment strategies for managing neuromusculoskeletal shoulder conditions.

objectiveTo examine the mechanisms underpinning the benefits of scapular taping.

designDescriptive laboratory study.

settingUniversity laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER

participantsA total of 15 individuals (8 men, 7 women; age = 31.0 ± 12.4 years, height = 170.9 ± 7.6 cm, mass = 73.8 ± 14.4 kg) with no history of shoulder pain. INTERVENTION(S): Scapular taping. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Surface electromyography (EMG) was used to assess the (1) magnitude and onset of contraction of the upper trapezius (UT), lower trapezius (LT), and serratus anterior relative to the contraction of the middle deltoid during active shoulder flexion and abduction and (2) corticomotor excitability (amplitude of motor-evoked potentials from transcranial magnetic stimulation) of these muscles at rest and during isometric abduction. Active shoulder-flexion and shoulder-abduction range of motion were also evaluated. All outcomes were measured before taping, immediately after taping, 24 hours after taping with the original tape on, and 24 hours after taping with the tape removed.

resultsOnset of contractions occurred earlier immediately after taping than before taping during abduction for the UT (34.18 ± 118.91 milliseconds and 93.95 ± 106.33 milliseconds, respectively, after middle deltoid contraction; P = .02) and during flexion for the LT (110.02 ± 109.83 milliseconds and 5.94 ± 92.35 milliseconds, respectively, before middle deltoid contraction; P = .06). These changes were not maintained 24 hours after taping. Mean motor-evoked potential onset of the middle deltoid was earlier at 24 hours after taping (tape on = 7.20 ± 4.33 milliseconds) than before taping (8.71 ± 5.24 milliseconds, P = .008). We observed no differences in peak root mean square EMG activity or corticomotor excitability of the scapular muscles among any time frames.

conclusionsScapular taping was associated with the earlier onset of UT and LT contractions during shoulder abduction and flexion, respectively. Altered corticomotor excitability did not underpin earlier EMG onsets of activity after taping in this sample. Our findings suggested that the optimal time to engage in rehabilitative exercises to facilitate onset of trapezius contractions during shoulder movements may be immediately after tape application.

Indexed as

Surgical TapeAdultDeltoid MuscleElectromyographyFemaleHumansIntermediate Back MusclesMaleMotor NeuronsMuscle ContractionMuscle, SkeletalRange of Motion, ArticularScapulaShoulderSuperficial Back Muscleselectromyographymuscle contractionphysical therapy techniquesrehabilitationscapulashoulder paintranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID29569944
PMCPMC5967282
OpenAlexW2792750041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.