Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29569729›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2018

A single exercise bout and locomotor learning after stroke: physiological, behavioural, and computational outcomes.

Charalambos C Charalambous, Carolina C Alcantara, Margaret A French, Xin Li, Kathleen S Matt, Hyosub E Kim, Susanne M Morton, Darcy S Reisman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Exercise intensity affects acute neurotrophic and neurophysiological responses poststroke.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2019
    Trial
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Study Paradigms and Principles Investigated in Motor Learning Research After Stroke: A Scoping Review.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Charalambos C CharalambousDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1547-1839
Carolina C AlcantaraDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Margaret A FrenchBiomechanics and Movement Science Program, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Xin LiDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Kathleen S MattCollege of Health Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Hyosub E KimDepartment of Psychology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0109-593X
Susanne M MortonDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Darcy S ReismanDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6546-0863

Funding

Behavioral and Neurophysiologic Process of Locomotor Learning After StrokeR01HD078330 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI REISMAN, DARCY S. · 2014 to 2025
$3.2M
Robotic Gait Training and Evaluation SystemS10RR028114 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI HIGGINSON, JILL S · 2011 to 2011
$404k
NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR028114NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD078330
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key pointsPrevious work demonstrated an effect of a single high-intensity exercise bout coupled with motor practice on the retention of a newly acquired skilled arm movement, in both neurologically intact and impaired adults. In the present study, using behavioural and computational analyses we demonstrated that a single exercise bout, regardless of its intensity and timing, did not increase the retention of a novel locomotor task after stroke. Considering both present and previous work, we postulate that the benefits of exercise effect may depend on the type of motor learning (e.g. skill learning, sensorimotor adaptation) and/or task (e.g. arm accuracy-tracking task, walking). ABSTRACT: Acute high-intensity exercise coupled with motor practice improves the retention of motor learning in neurologically intact adults. However, whether exercise could improve the retention of locomotor learning after stroke is still unknown. Here, we investigated the effect of exercise intensity and timing on the retention of a novel locomotor learning task (i.e. split-belt treadmill walking) after stroke. Thirty-seven people post stroke participated in two sessions, 24 h apart, and were allocated to active control (CON), treadmill walking (TMW), or total body exercise on a cycle ergometer (TBE). In session 1, all groups exercised for a short bout (∼5 min) at low (CON) or high (TMW and TBE) intensity and before (CON and TMW) or after (TBE) the locomotor learning task. In both sessions, the locomotor learning task was to walk on a split-belt treadmill in a 2:1 speed ratio (100% and 50% fast-comfortable walking speed) for 15 min. To test the effect of exercise on 24 h retention, we applied behavioural and computational analyses. Behavioural data showed that neither high-intensity group showed greater 24 h retention compared to CON, and computational data showed that 24 h retention was attributable to a slow learning process for sensorimotor adaptation. Our findings demonstrated that acute exercise coupled with a locomotor adaptation task, regardless of its intensity and timing, does not improve retention of the novel locomotor task after stroke. We postulate that exercise effects on motor learning may be context specific (e.g. type of motor learning and/or task) and interact with the presence of genetic variant (BDNF Val66Met).

Indexed as

Stroke RehabilitationAdaptation, PhysiologicalAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkersCase-Control StudiesComputational BiologyExercise TestFemaleGaitHealth BehaviorHumansLearningLocomotionMaleBiomarkerschronic strokecomputational motor controlexercise primingmotor learningrehabilitationsensorimotor adaptation

Identifiers

PMID29569729
PMCPMC5978382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.