ArticleMedical physics2018
Automatic intraoperative stitching of nonoverlapping cone-beam CT acquisitions.
Article in Medical physics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Source-detector trajectory optimization for FOV extension in dental CBCT imaging.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Computer-aided Design of Distal Femoral Osteotomy for the Valgus Knee and Effect of Correction Angle on Joint Loading by Finite Element Analysis.Orthopaedic surgery · 2022Article
- Automatic Registration and Error Color Maps to Improve Accuracy for Navigated Bone Tumor Surgery Using Intraoperative Cone-Beam CT.JB & JS open accessArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
purposeCone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is one of the primary imaging modalities in radiation therapy, dentistry, and orthopedic interventions. While CBCT provides crucial intraoperative information, it is bounded by a limited imaging volume, resulting in reduced effectiveness. This paper introduces an approach allowing real-time intraoperative stitching of overlapping and nonoverlapping CBCT volumes to enable 3D measurements on large anatomical structures.
methodsA CBCT-capable mobile C-arm is augmented with a red-green-blue-depth (RGBD) camera. An offline cocalibration of the two imaging modalities results in coregistered video, infrared, and x-ray views of the surgical scene. Then, automatic stitching of multiple small, nonoverlapping CBCT volumes is possible by recovering the relative motion of the C-arm with respect to the patient based on the camera observations. We propose three methods to recover the relative pose: RGB-based tracking of visual markers that are placed near the surgical site, RGBD-based simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) of the surgical scene which incorporates both color and depth information for pose estimation, and surface tracking of the patient using only depth data provided by the RGBD sensor.
resultsOn an animal cadaver, we show stitching errors as low as 0.33, 0.91, and 1.72 mm when the visual marker, RGBD SLAM, and surface data are used for tracking, respectively.
conclusionsThe proposed method overcomes one of the major limitations of CBCT C-arm systems by integrating vision-based tracking and expanding the imaging volume without any intraoperative use of calibration grids or external tracking systems. We believe this solution to be most appropriate for 3D intraoperative verification of several orthopedic procedures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.