Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29569099›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2018

Transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: evaluation of the learning curve.

T W A Koedam, M Veltcamp Helbach, P M van de Ven, Ph M Kruyt, N T van Heek, H J Bonjer, J B Tuynman, C Sietses

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 150 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Local Recurrence of Rectal Cancer After Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision and Risk Factors: A Nationwide Multicenter Cohort Study in Japan.Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024
    Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

T W A KoedamDepartment of Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Boelelaan 1117, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. t.koedam@vumc.nl.
M Veltcamp HelbachDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands.
P M van de VenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ph M KruytDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands.
N T van HeekDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands.
H J BonjerDepartment of Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Boelelaan 1117, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J B TuynmanDepartment of Surgery, VU University Medical Center, Boelelaan 1117, 1081HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
C SietsesDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Gelderse Vallei, Ede, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLZiekenhuis Gelderse Vallei · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) provides an excellent view of the resection margins for rectal cancer from below, but is challenging due to few anatomical landmarks. During implementation of this technique, patient safety and optimal outcomes need to be ensured. The aim of this study was to evaluate the learning curve of TaTME in patients with rectal cancer in order to optimize future training programs.

methodsAll consecutive patients after TaTME for rectal cancer between February 2012 and January 2017 were included in a single-center database. Influence of surgical experience on major postoperative complications, leakage rate and operating time was evaluated using cumulative sum charts and the splitting model. Correction for potential case-mix differences was performed.

resultsOver a period of 60 months, a total of 138 patients were included in this study. Adjusted for case-mix, improvement in postoperative outcomes was clearly seen after the first 40 patients, showing a decrease in major postoperative complications from 47.5 to 17.5% and leakage rate from 27.5 to 5%. Mean operating time (42 min) and conversion rate (from 10% to zero) was lower after transition to a two-team approach, but neither endpoint decreased with experience. Readmission and reoperation rates were not influenced by surgical experience.

conclusionsThe learning curve of TaTME affected major (surgical) postoperative complications for the first 40 patients. A two-team approach decreased operative time and conversion rate. When implementing this new technique, a thorough teaching and supervisory program is recommended to shorten the learning curve and improve the clinical outcomes of the first patients.

Indexed as

Learning CurveAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsRectal NeoplasmsRectumTransanal Endoscopic SurgeryTreatment OutcomeLearning curveRectal neoplasmsTransanal endoscopic surgery

Identifiers

PMID29569099
OpenAlexW2793230692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.