Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29569044›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2018

Impact of a training program on adherence to recommendations for care of venous lines in internal medicine departments in Spain.

María Guembe, María Jesús Pérez-Granda, José Antonio Capdevila, José Barberán, Blanca Pinilla, Emilio Bouza, in behalf of the NUVE Study Group

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

María GuembeDepartment of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain. mariaguembe@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7607-5848
María Jesús Pérez-GrandaInstituto de Investigación Sanitaria Gregorio Marañón (IISGM), Madrid, Spain.
José Antonio CapdevilaGrupo de Trabajo en Enfermedades Infecciosas de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna (GTEI-SEMI), Madrid, Spain.
José BarberánGrupo de Trabajo en Enfermedades Infecciosas de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna (GTEI-SEMI), Madrid, Spain.
Blanca PinillaGrupo de Trabajo en Enfermedades Infecciosas de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna (GTEI-SEMI), Madrid, Spain.
Emilio BouzaDepartment of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
in behalf of the NUVE Study Group
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón · ESSociedad Española de Medicina Interna · ESUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ES

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III CP13/00268Instituto de Salud Carlos III PI14/01933
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A high percentage of venous lines (VLs) are placed in non-ICU patients, particularly those treated in the internal medicine department (IMD). We assessed adherence to VL care after a training program aimed at nurses and clinicians attending patients admitted to Spanish IMDs. We performed a multicenter prospective observational point prevalence study in 14 Spanish IMDs in 2013 and 2016. We included all adult patients (> 18 years) admitted to IMDs on the study day and reviewed nursing records for patients with VL in place before and after a 1-year training program during 2015. Answers from an interview with head nurses of the IMDs regarding commonly used practices in the daily management of VLs were also compared. A total of 638 and 693 patients were seen during each period, respectively, and 530 and 598 patients had ≥ 1 VL implanted (83.1 vs. 86.3%). Catheters were considered unnecessary in 12.8 and 15.0% of cases (p = 0.28). Daily recording of the need for catheter use increased from 43.8 to 71.8% (p < 0.001). Furthermore, daily monitoring of the insertion site remained very frequent (94.4 vs. 92.2%; p = 0.16). The date of insertion was recorded in 86.3 and 85.5% of cases (p = 0.73), and no combination of closed connectors with open caps increased from 74.8 to 90.3% (p < 0.001). Overall, head nurses' knowledge improved in 4 out of 14 recommendations assessed (28.6%). A simple and easy program for training on management of VLs in Spanish IMDs was associated with improved quality of care.

Indexed as

Guideline AdherenceAgedAged, 80 and overCatheterization, Central VenousCross InfectionFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsInternal MedicineMalePractice Guidelines as TopicProspective StudiesSpainCentral venous lineImpactInternal medicine departmentTraining program

Identifiers

PMID29569044
OpenAlexW2790161509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.