Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29569035›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2018

[Radiological imaging of acute infectious and non-infectious enterocolitis].

J Wessling

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

J WesslingKlinik für diagnostische und interventionelle Radiologie und Neuroradiologie, Clemenshospital Münster, Düesbergweg 124, 48153, Münster, Deutschland. j.wessling@clemenshospital.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundComputed tomography (CT) is often used as the initial diagnostic test in patients with inflammatory and infectious types of enterocolitis. The differential diagnosis is broad, including infectious, non-infectious and vascular causes, which have substantially different management strategies. Although a definitive diagnosis often relies on endoscopic biopsy results, stool culture results or other clinical features, radiologists often help to guide the diagnosis.

objectivesThis article reviews the CT appearance of different infectious and inflammatory forms of enterocolitis. General and specific intramural and extramural CT findings in the small bowel and colon are discussed. Added focus is placed on distribution patterns and medication side effects that can act as important diagnostic clues.

resultsInfectious enterocolitis is due to bowel inflammation caused by bacteria, viruses, or parasites, which show a preferential localization. Pancolitis can be seen with Clostridium difficile with the relatively specific CT finding of the "giraffe coat" sign. Inflammatory enterocolitis can be primary (inflammatory bowel disease, vasculitis) or secondary (radiation therapy, graft versus host disease etc.). Ischemic colitis and enteritis can result from arterial compromise, low flow states that globally reduce perfusion or venous insufficiency. The CT appearance varies depending on the cause, the time of onset and grade of reperfusion.

conclusionKnowledge of characteristic mural and extramural CT of MRI findings, geographic distributions and therapy effects help to guide the differential diagnostics in inflammatory and infectious types of enterocolitis.

Indexed as

EnterocolitisDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansInflammationIntestine, SmallMagnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedComputed tomographyIntestinal wall patternIschemic colitisMesenteric ischemiaPseudomembranous colitis

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.