Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29569017›Full record

SynthesisQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2018

A review of preference-based measures for the assessment of quality of life in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy.

Christine Mpundu-Kaambwa, Gang Chen, Elisabeth Huynh, Remo Russo, Julie Ratcliffe

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Estimating QALYs in adults with cerebral palsy: mapping the San Martin scale to the EQ-5D-5L for economic evaluation.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Development of algorithms for estimating the Child Health Utility 9D from Caregiver Priorities and Child Health Index of Life with Disability.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christine Mpundu-KaambwaInstitute for Choice, University of South Australia Business School, Level 3 Way Lee Building, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia. christine.mpundu-kaambwa@unisa.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-8152-6068
Gang ChenCentre for Health Economics, Monash Business School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8385-5965
Elisabeth HuynhInstitute for Choice, University of South Australia Business School, Level 3 Way Lee Building, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1855-3143
Remo RussoFaculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia.
Julie RatcliffeInstitute for Choice, University of South Australia Business School, Level 3 Way Lee Building, North Terrace, Adelaide, SA, 5001, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7365-1988

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo examine the psychometric properties and suitability for use within the context of cerebral palsy research in children and adolescents of generic preference-based outcome measures (PROMs).

methodsNine electronic databases were searched in this systematic review. The consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments (COSMIN) checklist were used to measure the psychometric properties of the PROMs. A meta-analysis was used to pool correlation coefficients for convergent validity using the Schmidt-Hunter method. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I-squared statistic (I

resultsFour preference-based PROMs were identified from eight studies: Health Utilities Index-Mark 2 and 3 (HUI-2 and HUI-3, respectively), the Assessment Quality of Life-4 dimension (AQoL-4D) and the EuroQol-5 dimension 3 level (EQ-5D-3L). Only the HUI system was primarily developed for application with children/adolescents though health-state values for scoring the PROM were elicited from adults. The HUI-3 covered the most relevant constructs though it excludes important modules of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) such as activity limitations and participation restrictions. In terms of psychometric properties, evidence was presented for only five of COSMIN measurement properties: reliability (HUI3), measurement error (HUI-3), content validity (HUI-2 and HUI-3), Hypotheses testing (HUI-3 and AQoL-4D) and criterion validity (HUI-3). No papers reported on internal consistency, structural validity, cross-cultural validity or responsiveness of the preference-based measures in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy.

conclusionsThis review highlights the dearth in studies using preference-based PROMs to measure HRQOL associated with cerebral palsy in children and adolescents. The HUI-3 demonstrated the strongest psychometric properties, though it does not cover all dimensions relevant to this population.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CarePatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeAdolescentCerebral PalsyChildChild, PreschoolConsensusCross-Sectional StudiesDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMalePatient PreferencePsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsAdolescentCerebral palsyChildInstrumentsQuality of lifeUtility

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.