Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29568804›Full record

ArticleJDR clinical and translational research2018

Screening for Diabetes Risk Using Integrated Dental and Medical Electronic Health Record Data.

A Acharya, B Cheng, R Koralkar, B Olson, I B Lamster, C Kunzel, E Lalla

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JDR clinical and translational research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A AcharyaMarshfiled Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI, USA.
B ChengMailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
R KoralkarMarshfiled Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI, USA.
B OlsonMarshfiled Clinic Research Institute, Marshfield, WI, USA.
I B LamsterMailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
C KunzelCollege of Dental Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
E LallaCollege of Dental Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Columbia University · USMarshfield Clinic · US

Funding

Secondary Analysis of EHR Data to Enhance Care of Dental Patients with DiabetesR03DE024239 · NIDCR · MARSHFIELD CLINIC RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI ACHARYA, AMIT, LALLA, EVANTHIA · 2015 to 2016
$323k
NIDCR NIH HHS R03 DE024239
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Undiagnosed diabetes and prediabetes present a serious public health challenge. We previously reported that data available in the dental setting can serve as a tool for early dysglycemia identification in a primarily Hispanic, urban population. In the present study, we sought to determine how the identification approach can be recalibrated to detect diabetes or prediabetes in a White, rural cohort and whether an integrated dental-medical electronic health record (iEHR) offers further value to the process. We analyzed iEHR data from the Marshfield Clinic, a health system providing care in rural Wisconsin, for dental patients who were ≥21 y of age, reported that they had never been told they had diabetes, had an initial periodontal examination of at least 2 quadrants, and had a glycemic assessment within 3 mo of that examination. We then assessed the performance of multiple predictive models for prediabetes/diabetes. The study outcome, glycemic status, was gleaned from the medical module of the iEHR based on American Diabetes Association blood test cutoffs. The sample size was 4,560 individuals. Multivariate logistic regression revealed that the best performance was achieved by a model that took advantage of the iEHR. Predictors included age, sex, race, ethnicity, number of missing teeth, percentage of teeth with at least 1 pocket ≥5 mm from the dental EHR, and overweight/obesity, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and smoking status from the medical EHR. The model achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.71 (95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.72), yielding a sensitivity of 0.70 and a specificity of 0.62. Across a range of populations, informed by certain patient characteristics, dental care team members can play a role in helping to identify dental patients with undiagnosed diabetes or prediabetes. The accuracy of the prediction increases when dental findings are combined with information from the medical EHR.

Indexed as

dentistshyperglycemiaperiodontitisprediabetic stateprevention & controlrisk

Identifiers

PMID29568804
PMCPMC5858652
OpenAlexW2789232018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.