Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29568685›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2018

Food-related salience processing in healthy subjects during word recognition: Fronto-parietal network activation as revealed by independent component analysis.

Annette Safi, Christoph Nikendei, Valentin Terhoeven, Matthias Weisbrod, Anuradha Sharma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Annette SafiDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics Centre for Psychosocial Medicine University Hospital Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2106-1369
Christoph NikendeiDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics Centre for Psychosocial Medicine University Hospital Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany.
Valentin TerhoevenDepartment of General Internal Medicine and Psychosomatics Centre for Psychosocial Medicine University Hospital Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany.
Matthias WeisbrodResearch Group Neurocognition Department of General Psychiatry Centre for Psychosocial Medicine University Hospital Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany.
Anuradha SharmaResearch Group Neurocognition Department of General Psychiatry Centre for Psychosocial Medicine University Hospital Heidelberg Heidelberg Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The study aimed to isolate and localize mutually independent cognitive processes evoked during a word recognition task involving food-related and food-neutral words using independent component analysis (ICA) for continuously recorded EEG data. Recognition memory (old/new effect) involves cognitive subcomponents-familiarity and recollection-which may be temporally and spatially dissociated in the brain. Food words may evoke additional attentional salience which may interact with the old/new effect. Methods: Sixteen satiated female participants undertook a word recognition task consisting of an encoding phase (learning of presented words, 40 food-related and 40 food neutral) and a test phase (recognition of previously learned words and new words). Simultaneously recorded 64-channel EEG data were decomposed into mutually independent components using the Infomax algorithm in EEGLAB. The components were localized using single dipole fitting using a four-shell BESA head model. The resulting (nonartefactual) components with <15% residual variance were clustered across subjects using the kmeans algorithm resulting in five meaningful clusters localized to fronto-parietal regions. Repeated-measures anova was employed to test main effects (old/new and food relevance) and their interaction on cluster time courses. Results: Early task-relevant old/new effects were localized to the medial frontal gyrus (MFG) and later old/new effects to the right parietal regions (precuneus). Food-related (nontask-relevant) salience effects were localized to bilateral parietal regions (left precuneus and right postcentral gyrus). Food-related salience interacted with task relevance, the old/new effect in MFG being significant only for food-neutral words highlighting central the role of MFG as the converging site of endogenous and exogenous salience inputs. Conclusion: Our results indicate ICA to be a valid technique to decompose complex neurophysiological signals involving multiple cognitive processes and implicate the fronto-parietal network as an important attentional network for processing salience and task demands.

Indexed as

FoodAttentionBrain MappingElectroencephalographyEvoked PotentialsFemaleFrontal LobeHealthy VolunteersHumansLearningNeural PathwaysParietal LobeRecognition, PsychologySatiationYoung Adultdipole source analysiselectroencephalographyfood saliencefronto‐parietal networkindependent component analysisrecognition memory

Identifiers

PMID29568685
PMCPMC5853639

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.