Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29568671›Full record

ReviewPublic health reviews

How do accountability problems lead to maternal health inequities? A review of qualitative literature from Indian public sector.

Mukesh Hamal, Marjolein Dieleman, Vincent De Brouwere, Tjard de Cock Buning

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Public health reviews. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Annals of global health · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Aligning theory with practice: Child health programmes in Malaysia, a Narrative Review.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mukesh Hamal1Athena Institute for Research on Innovation and Communication in Health and Life Sciences (VU University), De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8579-1929
Marjolein Dieleman1Athena Institute for Research on Innovation and Communication in Health and Life Sciences (VU University), De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Vincent De Brouwere3Woman and Child Health Research Centre, Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Tjard de Cock Buning1Athena Institute for Research on Innovation and Communication in Health and Life Sciences (VU University), De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are several studies from different geographical settings and levels on maternal health, but none analyzes how accountability problems may contribute to the maternal health outcomes. This study aimed to analyze how accountability problems in public health system lead to maternal deaths and inequities in India.

methodsA conceptual framework was developed bringing together

resultsAn overarching influence of health system-related factors over non-health system-related factors leading to maternal deaths and inequities was observed. A potential link among such factors was identified with gaps in accountability functions at all levels of health system pertaining to policy gaps or conflicting/discriminatory policies and political commitment. A large number of gaps were also observed concerning performance or implementation of existing standards. Inherent to these issues was potentially a lack of proper monitoring and accountability functions. A critical role of power was observed influencing the accountability functions.

conclusionThe narrative and interpretive synthesis approach allowed to integrate and reframe the relevant comparable information from the limited empirical studies to identify the hot spots of systemic flaws from an accountability perspective. The framework highlighted problems in health system beyond health service delivery to wider areas such as policy or politics justifying their relevance and importance in such analysis. A crucial message from the study pertains to a need to move away from the traditional concept of viewing accountability as a blame-game approach and a concern of limited frontline health workers towards a constructive and systemic approach.

Indexed as

AccountabilityHealth systemIndiaInequityMaternal health

Identifiers

PMID29568671
PMCPMC5856307

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.