Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29568634›Full record

ArticleSouthern African journal of HIV medicine2017

Patient and provider attitudes to emergency department-based HIV counselling and testing in South Africa.

Bhakti Hansoti, Sarah E Hill, Madeleine Whalen, David Stead, Andy Parrish, Richard Rothman, Yu-Hsiang Hsieh, Thomas C Quinn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Southern African journal of HIV medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The burden of HIV and tuberculosis on the resuscitation area of an urban district-level hospital in Cape Town.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Bhakti HansotiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0188-9764
Sarah E HillKriegler School of Arts and Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5184-2190
Madeleine WhalenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-6480-8733
David SteadDepartment of Internal Medicine, Frere Hospital, South Africa.
Andy ParrishDepartment of Internal Medicine, Frere Hospital, South Africa.
Richard RothmanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1017-9505
Yu-Hsiang HsiehDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, United States.
Thomas C QuinnDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3163-579X
Johns Hopkins University · USFrere Hospital · ZAJohns Hopkins Medicine · USOffice of Extramural Research · US

Funding

International Studies of the Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS)ZIAAI000361 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI REDD, ANDREW · 2009 to 2025
$15.8M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe national South African HIV Counselling and Testing (HCT) guidelines mandate that voluntary counselling and testing (VCT) should be offered in all healthcare facilities. Emergency departments (EDs) are at the forefront of many healthcare facilities, yet VCT is not routinely implemented in this setting.

methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study that surveyed patients and healthcare providers at a tertiary care ED in the spring and summer of 2016 to ascertain their attitudes to VCT in the ED. We also used two previously validated survey instruments to gather data on patients' HIV knowledge and providers' stigma against patients living with HIV, as we anticipated that these may have an impact on providers' and patients' attitudes to the provision of HIV testing within the ED, and may offer insights for future intervention development.

resultsA total of 104 patients and 26 providers were enrolled in the study. Overall, patients responded more favourably to ED-based HIV testing (92.3%) compared to providers (only 40% responded favourably). When asked about potential barriers to receiving or providing HIV testing, 16.4% of patients and 24% of providers felt that the subject of HIV was too sensitive and 58.7% of patients and 80% of providers indicated that privacy and confidentiality issues would pose major barriers to implementing ED-based HIV testing.

conclusionThis study shows that while ED-based HIV testing is overall highly acceptable to patients, providers seem less willing to provide this service. The survey data also suggest that future development of ED-based testing strategies should take into consideration privacy and confidentiality concerns that may arise within a busy emergency care setting. Furthermore, every effort should be made to tackle HIV stigma among providers to improve overall attitudes towards HIV-positive individuals that present for care in the ED.

Identifiers

PMID29568634
PMCPMC5843014
OpenAlexW2619358606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.