Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29568609›Full record

ArticleSouthern African journal of HIV medicine2016

Computational models as predictors of HIV treatment outcomes for the Phidisa cohort in South Africa.

Andrew Revell, Paul Khabo, Lotty Ledwaba, Sean Emery, Dechao Wang, Robin Wood, Carl Morrow, Hugo Tempelman, Raph L Hamers, Peter Reiss and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Southern African journal of HIV medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Andrew RevellThe HIV Resistance Response Database Initiative (RDI), London, United Kingdom.
Paul KhaboProject PHIDISA, South African Military Health Service (SAMHS), Lyttelton, South Africa.
Lotty LedwabaProject PHIDISA, South African National Defence Force (SANDF), Lyttelton, South Africa.
Sean EmeryKirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Dechao WangThe HIV Resistance Response Database Initiative (RDI), London, United Kingdom.
Robin WoodThe Desmond Tutu HIV Centre, University of Cape Town, South Africa.
Carl MorrowThe Desmond Tutu HIV Centre, University of Cape Town, South Africa.
Hugo TempelmanNdlovu Care Group, Elandsdoorn, South Africa.
Raph L HamersAcademic Medical Center of the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Peter ReissAcademic Medical Center of the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ard van SighemStichting HIV Monitoring, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Anton PozniakChelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Julio MontanerBC Centre for Excellence in HIV/AIDS, Vancouver, Canada.
H Clifford LaneNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, United States.
Brendan LarderThe HIV Resistance Response Database Initiative (RDI), London, United Kingdom.

Funding

CCR NIH HHS HHSN261200800001CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261200800001E
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelecting the optimal combination of HIV drugs for an individual in resource-limited settings is challenging because of the limited availability of drugs and genotyping.

objectiveThe evaluation as a potential treatment support tool of computational models that predict response to therapy without a genotype, using cases from the Phidisa cohort in South Africa.

methodsCases from Phidisa of treatment change following failure were identified that had the following data available: baseline CD4 count and viral load, details of failing and previous antiretroviral drugs, drugs in new regimen and time to follow-up. The HIV Resistance Response Database Initiative's (RDI's) models used these data to predict the probability of a viral load < 50 copies/mL at follow-up. The models were also used to identify effective alternative combinations of three locally available drugs.

resultsThe models achieved accuracy (area under the receiver-operator characteristic curve) of 0.72 when predicting response to therapy, which is less accurate than for an independent global test set (0.80) but at least comparable to that of genotyping with rules-based interpretation. The models were able to identify alternative locally available three-drug regimens that were predicted to be effective in 69% of all cases and 62% of those whose new treatment failed in the clinic.

conclusionThe predictive accuracy of the models for these South African patients together with the results of previous studies suggest that the RDI's models have the potential to optimise treatment selection and reduce virological failure in different patient populations, without the use of a genotype.

Identifiers

PMID29568609
PMCPMC5843195

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.