Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29568515›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2018

Prevalence and molecular characterization of

A E Kates, D Thapaliya, T C Smith, M L Chorazy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Bacterial Amyloids Phenol Soluble Modulins fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

A E Kates1Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI USA.
D Thapaliya2Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Environmental Health Services, College of Public Health, Kent State University, Kent, OH USA.
T C Smith2Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Environmental Health Services, College of Public Health, Kent State University, Kent, OH USA.
M L Chorazy3Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To determine the prevalence of intestinal Methods: A cross-sectional study of 781 specimens from inpatients and outpatients at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Clinical Microbiology Laboratory was conducted. Results: Out of 625 patients included in the final study, 58 were positive for Conclusions:

Indexed as

Molecular EpidemiologyAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsBacterial Typing TechniquesChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDrug Resistance, Multiple, BacterialFecesFemaleGastrointestinal TractGenes, BacterialAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial ProteinsmecA protein, Staphylococcus aureusPenicillin-Binding ProteinsAntibiotic resistanceHospitalsIntestinal carriageMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID29568515
PMCPMC5859634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.