Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29568497›Full record

ReviewF1000Research2018

Progress and challenges in TB vaccine development.

Gerald Voss, Danilo Casimiro, Olivier Neyrolles, Ann Williams, Stefan H E Kaufmann, Helen McShane, Mark Hatherill, Helen A Fletcher

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in F1000Research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. In silico design ofHeliyon · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Loss of circulating CD8αbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The combination ofFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Analysis of real-time PCRThe Egyptian journal of medical human genetics · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Gerald VossTuberculosis Vaccine Initiative (TBVI), Lelystad, Netherlands.
Danilo CasimiroAeras Global TB Vaccine Foundation, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.
Olivier NeyrollesInstitut de Pharmacologie et de Biologie Structurale, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France.
Ann WilliamsCentre for Emergency Preparedness and Response, Public Health England, Salisbury, UK.
Stefan H E KaufmannMax Planck Institute for Infection Biology, Berlin, Germany.
Helen McShaneImmunology & Infection, TB Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Mark HatherillThe Jenner Institute, Nuffield Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Helen A FletcherSouth African Tuberculosis Vaccine Initiative, Institute of Infectious Disease & Molecular Medicine and Division of Immunology, Department of Pathology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0435-1006
University of Cape Town · ZAAeras · USCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRMax Planck Institute for Infection Biology · DEPublic Health England · GBTuBerculosis Vaccine Initiative · NLUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Bacille Calmette Guerin (BCG) vaccine can provide decades of protection against tuberculosis (TB) disease, and although imperfect, BCG is proof that vaccine mediated protection against TB is a possibility. A new TB vaccine is, therefore, an inevitability; the question is how long will it take us to get there? We have made substantial progress in the development of vaccine platforms, in the identification of antigens and of immune correlates of risk of TB disease. We have also standardized animal models to enable head-to-head comparison and selection of candidate TB vaccines for further development.  To extend our understanding of the safety and immunogenicity of TB vaccines we have performed experimental medicine studies to explore route of administration and have begun to develop controlled human infection models. Driven by a desire to reduce the length and cost of human efficacy trials we have applied novel approaches to later stage clinical development, exploring alternative clinical endpoints to prevention of disease outcomes. Here, global leaders in TB vaccine development discuss the progress made and the challenges that remain. What emerges is that, despite scientific progress, few vaccine candidates have entered clinical trials in the last 5 years and few vaccines in clinical trials have progressed to efficacy trials. Crucially, we have undervalued the knowledge gained from our "failed" trials and fostered a culture of risk aversion that has limited new funding for clinical TB vaccine development. The unintended consequence of this abundance of caution is lack of diversity of new TB vaccine candidates and stagnation of the clinical pipeline. We have a variety of new vaccine platform technologies, mycobacterial antigens and animal and human models.  However, we will not encourage progression of vaccine candidates into clinical trials unless we evaluate and embrace risk in pursuit of vaccine development.

Indexed as

BCGclinical trialsTuberculosisvaccinevaccine development

Identifiers

PMID29568497
PMCPMC5850090
OpenAlexW2786068252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.