Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29568335›Full record

ArticleAnalytical methods : advancing methods and applications2018

Paper Spray Mass Spectrometry for High-Throughput Quantification of Nicotine and Cotinine.

James E Keating, John T Minges, Scott H Randell, Gary L Glish

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical methods : advancing methods and applications, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

James E KeatingDepartment of Chemistry, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA.
John T MingesMarsico Lung Inst. Cyst. Fibrosis Res. Ctr., The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA.
Scott H RandellMarsico Lung Inst. Cyst. Fibrosis Res. Ctr., The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA.
Gary L GlishDepartment of Chemistry, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

The Impact of Tobacco Exposure on the Lungs Innate Defense SystemP50HL120100 · NHLBI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI TARRAN, ROBERT · 2013 to 2017
$21.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS P50 HL120100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid release of new tobacco products requires high-throughput quantitative methods to support tobacco research. Sample preparation for LC-MS and GC-MS is time consuming and limits throughput. Paper spray tandem mass spectrometry (PS-MS/MS) is proposed and validated as a simple and rapid method for quantification of nicotine and cotinine in complex matrices to support tobacco-related research. Air liquid interface (ALI) human tracheobronchial epithelial cell (HTBEC) cultures were exposed to tobacco smoke using a Vitrocell VC-10 smoking machine. Apical culture washes (phosphate buffered saline, PBS) and basolateral media were analyzed with the PS-MS/MS method. GC-MS/MS was used as a comparative quantitative technique. The PS-MS/MS approach allowed for direct spotting of samples on the paper substrate, whereas the GC-MS/MS method required additional sample preparation in the form of solvent-solvent extraction. Limits of quantitation (LOQs) were higher with the PS-MS/MS approach than GC-MS/MS, but still below the relevant concentrations found in HTBEC smoke exposure experiments as well as most clinical applications. PS-MS/MS is readily achieved on mass spectrometers that include atmospheric pressure inlets, and allows for convenient quantification from complex matrices that would otherwise require additional sample preparation and chromatographic separation.

Identifiers

PMID29568335
PMCPMC5858713
OpenAlexW2768165706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.