Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29568170›Full record

ArticleJournal of Indian Society of Periodontology

Effectiveness of three mouthwashes - Manuka honey, Raw honey, and Chlorhexidine on plaque and gingival scores of 12-15-year-old school children: A randomized controlled field trial.

Richa Singhal, Mahantesh Siddibhavi, Roopali Sankeshwari, Pratibha Patil, Sagar Jalihal, Anil Ankola

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Comparative Evaluation of 3 Commercial Mouthwash Formulations on Clinical Parameters of Chronic Gingivitis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Clinical and microbial evaluation of mouthwash containingJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Richa SinghalDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, KAHE'S KLE V.K. Institute of Dental Sciences, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research (KLE university), Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
Mahantesh SiddibhaviDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, KAHE'S KLE V.K. Institute of Dental Sciences, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research (KLE university), Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
Roopali SankeshwariDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, KAHE'S KLE V.K. Institute of Dental Sciences, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research (KLE university), Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
Pratibha PatilDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, KAHE'S KLE V.K. Institute of Dental Sciences, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research (KLE university), Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
Sagar JalihalDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, KAHE'S KLE V.K. Institute of Dental Sciences, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research (KLE university), Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
Anil AnkolaDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, KAHE'S KLE V.K. Institute of Dental Sciences, KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research (KLE university), Belagavi, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe aim of this study is to compare the effectiveness of three types of mouthwashes manuka honey (MH), raw honey (RH), and chlorhexidine (CHX) on plaque and gingival scores of 12-15-year-old government school children. STUDY

designThis study was a double-blind, randomized controlled field trial conducted in Belagavi city, India. MATERIALS AND

methodsOne hundred and thirty-five government school children aged 12-15 years were randomly selected and allocated into three groups, RH, MH, and CHX mouthwash groups. Ten milliliters each of honey-based mouthwash formulation and CHX mouthwashes (0.2%) were administered according to the group allocation twice daily for 21 days. All the children were examined at baseline, 22

resultsDescriptive statistics was applied for distribution of study participants according to age and gender. One-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's

conclusionHoney-based mouthwash showed a promising antimicrobial effect on dental caries and plaque and gingival scores.

Indexed as

Childdental plaquegingivitishoneymouthwash

Identifiers

PMID29568170
PMCPMC5855267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.