Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29568052›Full record

ReviewNature chemistry2018

Strategies for microbial synthesis of high-value phytochemicals.

Sijin Li, Yanran Li, Christina D Smolke

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature chemistry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Co-Overexpression ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Combined metabolic and enzymatic engineering forSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sijin LiDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Yanran LiDepartment of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Riverside, CA, USA.
Christina D SmolkeDepartment of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. csmolke@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · USUniversity of California, Riverside · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phytochemicals are of great pharmaceutical and agricultural importance, but often exhibit low abundance in nature. Recent demonstrations of industrial-scale production of phytochemicals in yeast have shown that microbial production of these high-value chemicals is a promising alternative to sourcing these molecules from native plant hosts. However, a number of challenges remain in the broader application of this approach, including the limited knowledge of plant secondary metabolism and the inefficient reconstitution of plant metabolic pathways in microbial hosts. In this Review, we discuss recent strategies to achieve microbial biosynthesis of complex phytochemicals, including strategies to: (1) reconstruct plant biosynthetic pathways that have not been fully elucidated by mining enzymes from native and non-native hosts or by enzyme engineering; (2) enhance plant enzyme activity, specifically cytochrome P450 activity, by improving efficiency, selectivity, expression or electron transfer; and (3) enhance overall reaction efficiency of multi-enzyme pathways by dynamic control, compartmentalization or optimization with the host's metabolism. We also highlight remaining challenges to - and future opportunities of - this approach.

Indexed as

Cytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemEscherichia coliMetabolic EngineeringPhytochemicalsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemPhytochemicals

Identifiers

PMID29568052
OpenAlexW2790018487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.