Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29568048›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Electrospinning over Solvent Casting: Tuning of Mechanical Properties of Membranes.

Kajal Ghosal, Aniruddha Chandra, Praveen G, Snigdha S, Sudeep Roy, Christian Agatemor, Sabu Thomas, Ivo Provaznik

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Electrospinning CaCOPolymers · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. 3D printing and additive manufacturing · 2024
    Article
  11. Advances in Membrane Separation for Biomaterial Dewatering.Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids · 2024
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Can we achieve biomimetic electrospun scaffolds with gelatin alone?Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kajal GhosalCenter for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Mahatma Gandhi University, Priyadarshini Hill, Kottayam, 686560, Kerala, India. kajal.ghosal@gmail.com.
Aniruddha ChandraElectronics and Communication Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology, Durgapur, 713209, West Bengal, India.
Praveen GCenter for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Mahatma Gandhi University, Priyadarshini Hill, Kottayam, 686560, Kerala, India.
Snigdha SCenter for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Mahatma Gandhi University, Priyadarshini Hill, Kottayam, 686560, Kerala, India.
Sudeep RoyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic.
Christian AgatemorSchool of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, 52 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA, 02138, USA.
Sabu ThomasCenter for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Mahatma Gandhi University, Priyadarshini Hill, Kottayam, 686560, Kerala, India.
Ivo ProvaznikDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czech Republic. provaznik@feec.vutbr.cz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We put forth our opinion regarding the enhanced plasticity and modulation of mechanical properties of polymeric films obtained through electrospinning process in this article. In majority of the pharmaceutical, biomedical, and packaging applications, it is desirable that polymer based matrices should be soft, flexible, and have a moderate toughness. In order to convert inflexible and brittle polymers, adjuvants in the form of plasticizers are added to improve the flexibility and smoothness of solvent casted polymer films. However, many of these plasticizers are under scrutiny for their toxic effects and environmental hazards. In addition, plasticizers also increase the cost of end products. This has motivated the scientific community to investigate alternate approaches. The changes imparted in membrane casted by electrospinning were tried to be proved by SEM, Mechanical property study, DSC and XRD studies. We have showed dramatic improvement in flexibility of poly(ε-caprolactone) based nanofiber matrix prepared by electrospinning method whereas solvent casting method without any plasticizer produced very brittle, inflexible film of PCL. Modulation capacity of mechanical properties is also recorded. We tried to support our opinion by citing several similar findings available in the open literature. The electrospinning method helps in plasticization and in tuning mechanical properties.

Identifiers

PMID29568048
PMCPMC5864752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.