Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29567850›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2018

Levels of detection of hypertension in primary medical care and interventions to improve detection: a systematic review of the evidence since 2000.

Richard Baker, Andrew Wilson, Keith Nockels, Shona Agarwal, Priya Modi, John Bankart

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Does shortage of GPs matter? A cross-sectional study of practice population life expectancy.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. NHS Health Checks: an observational study of equity and outcomes 2009-2017.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2021
    Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Richard BakerDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Andrew WilsonDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Keith NockelsLearning and Teaching Services, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Shona AgarwalDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Priya ModiFaculty of Medicine, Charles' University, Praha, Czech Republic.
John BankartDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
University of Leicester · GBDepartment of Medical Sciences · BYFaculty (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn England, many hypertensives are not detected by primary medical care. Higher detection is associated with lower premature mortality. We aimed to summarise recent evidence on detection and interventions to improve detection in order to inform policies to improve care.

designData sources: systematic review of articles published since 2000. Searches of Medline and Embase were undertaken. Eligibility criteria: published in English, any study design, the setting was general practice and studies included patients aged 18 or over. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: screening schemes, studies in primary care settings other than general practice, discussion or comment pieces.

participantsadult patients of primary medical care services. SYNTHESIS: study heterogeneity precluded a statistical synthesis, and papers were described in summary tables.

resultsSeventeen quantitative and one qualitative studies were included. Detection rates varied by gender and ethnic group, but longitudinal studies indicated an improvement in detection over time. Patient socioeconomic factors did not influence detection, but living alone was associated with lower detection. Few health system factors were associated with detection, but in two studies higher numbers of general practitioners per 1000 population were associated with higher detection. Three studies investigated interventions to improve detection, but none showed evidence of effectiveness. LIMITATIONS: The search was limited to studies published from 2000, in English. There were few studies of interventions to improve detection, and a meta-analysis was not possible. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Levels of detection of hypertension by general practices may be improving, but large numbers of people with hypertension remain undetected. Improvement in detection is therefore required, but guidance for primary medical care is not provided by the few studies of interventions included in this review. Primary care teams should continue to use low-cost, practical approaches to detecting hypertension until evidence from new studies of interventions to improve detection is available.

Indexed as

HumansHypertensionMortality, PrematurePrimary Health CareRandomized Controlled Trials as Topicdetectionhypertensionprimary carepublic health

Identifiers

PMID29567850
PMCPMC5875641
OpenAlexW2793036469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.