Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29567655›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2018

3D Deep Learning Angiography (3D-DLA) from C-arm Conebeam CT.

J C Montoya, Y Li, C Strother, G-H Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J C MontoyaFrom the Departments of Medical Physics (J.C.M., Y.L., G.-H.C.).ORCID 0000-0001-6351-6141
Y LiFrom the Departments of Medical Physics (J.C.M., Y.L., G.-H.C.).ORCID 0000-0002-1635-5178
C StrotherRadiology (C.S., G.-H.C.), University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.ORCID 0000-0002-4235-8081
G-H ChenFrom the Departments of Medical Physics (J.C.M., Y.L., G.-H.C.) gchen7@wisc.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-2263-1028

Funding

One Stop Shop Imaging for Acute Ischemic StrokeTreatmentU01EB021183 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI CHEN, GUANG-HONG · 2015 to 2020
$3.5M
NIBIB NIH HHS U01 EB021183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeDeep learning is a branch of artificial intelligence that has demonstrated unprecedented performance in many medical imaging applications. Our purpose was to develop a deep learning angiography method to generate 3D cerebral angiograms from a single contrast-enhanced C-arm conebeam CT acquisition in order to reduce image artifacts and radiation dose. MATERIALS AND

methodsA set of 105 3D rotational angiography examinations were randomly selected from an internal data base. All were acquired using a clinical system in conjunction with a standard injection protocol. More than 150 million labeled voxels from 35 subjects were used for training. A deep convolutional neural network was trained to classify each image voxel into 3 tissue types (vasculature, bone, and soft tissue). The trained deep learning angiography model was then applied for tissue classification into a validation cohort of 8 subjects and a final testing cohort of the remaining 62 subjects. The final vasculature tissue class was used to generate the 3D deep learning angiography images. To quantify the generalization error of the trained model, we calculated the accuracy, sensitivity, precision, and Dice similarity coefficients for vasculature classification in relevant anatomy. The 3D deep learning angiography and clinical 3D rotational angiography images were subjected to a qualitative assessment for the presence of intersweep motion artifacts.

resultsVasculature classification accuracy and 95% CI in the testing dataset were 98.7% (98.3%-99.1%). No residual signal from osseous structures was observed for any 3D deep learning angiography testing cases except for small regions in the otic capsule and nasal cavity compared with 37% (23/62) of the 3D rotational angiographies.

conclusionsDeep learning angiography accurately recreated the vascular anatomy of the 3D rotational angiography reconstructions without a mask. Deep learning angiography reduced misregistration artifacts induced by intersweep motion, and it reduced radiation exposure required to obtain clinically useful 3D rotational angiography.

Indexed as

Deep LearningArtifactsCerebral AngiographyHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID29567655
PMCPMC6758552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.