Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29567637›Full record

ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2018

Patient and Family Engagement in the Design of a Mobile Health Solution for Pediatric Asthma: Development and Feasibility Study.

Andrew McWilliams, Kelly Reeves, Lindsay Shade, Elizabeth Burton, Hazel Tapp, Cheryl Courtlandt, Andrew Gunter, Michael F Dulin

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03867903 (BabySparks© App), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03867903 completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

BabySparks© App: A Pilot Study of mHealth Adherence to a Developmental Application for Infants After Neonatal Cardiac Surgery

TypeobservationalSponsorChildren's Mercy Hospital Kansas CityRan2019 to 2023Enrolled66ConditionsDevelopment, Child, Adherence, Patient, Congenital Heart DiseaseArmsBabysparks Application, pre and post-test Redcap Survey
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Implementation of Coach McLungsBMC medical informatics and decision making · 2022
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A Scoping Review on How to Make Hospitals health Literate Healthcare Organizations.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew McWilliams *Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3406-9201
Kelly Reeves *Department of Family Medicine, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0729-2192
Lindsay Shade *Department of Family Medicine, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0342-4365
Elizabeth Burton *Community Care Partners of Greater Mecklenburg, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4023-8534
Hazel Tapp *Department of Family Medicine, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0867-4635
Cheryl Courtlandt *Department of Pediatrics, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8031-6827
Andrew Gunter *Department of Pediatrics, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, NC, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3026-9065
Michael F Dulin *Academy of Population Health Innovation, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of North Carolina Charlotte, Charlotte, NC, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2530-9915
Carolinas Healthcare System · USCommunity Care Partners · USUniversity of North Carolina at Charlotte · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAsthma is a highly prevalent, chronic disease with significant morbidity, cost, and disparities in health outcomes. While adherence to asthma treatment guidelines can improve symptoms and decrease exacerbations, most patients receive care that is not guideline-based. New approaches that incorporate shared decision-making (SDM) and health information technology (IT) are needed to positively impact asthma management. Despite the promise of health IT to improve efficiency and outcomes in health care, new IT solutions frequently suffer from a lack of widespread adoption and do not achieve desired results, as a consequence of not involving end-users in design.

objectiveTo describe a case study of a pediatric asthma SDM health IT solution's development and demonstrate a methodology for engaging actual patients and families in IT development. Perspectives are shared from the vantage point of the research team and a parent of a child with asthma, who participated on the development team.

methodsWe adapted user-centric design principles to engage actual users across three main development phases: project initiation, ideation, and usability testing. To facilitate the necessary level of user engagement, our approach included: (1) a Development Workgroup consisting of patients, caregivers, and providers who met regularly with the research team; and (2) "real-world users" consisting of patients, caregivers, and providers recruited from a variety of care locations, including safety-net clinics.

resultsUsing this methodology, we successful partnered with asthma patients and families to create an interactive, digital solution called Carolinas Asthma Coach. Carolinas Asthma Coach incorporates SDM principles to elicit patient information, including goals and preferences, and provides health-literate, tailored education with specific guideline-based recommendations for patients and their providers. Of the patients, caregivers, and providers surveyed, 100% (n=60) said they would recommend Carolinas Asthma Coach to a friend or colleague. Qualitative feedback from users provided support for the usability and engaging nature of the app.

conclusionsThis project demonstrates the feasibility and benefits of deploying user-centric design methods that engage real patients and caregivers throughout the health IT design process.

Indexed as

engagementhealth information technologypediatric asthmashared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID29567637
PMCPMC5887041
OpenAlexW2791246997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.