Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29567393›Full record

ReviewFree radical biology & medicine2018

Ascorbic acid metabolism and functions: A comparison of plants and mammals.

Nicholas Smirnoff

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Free radical biology & medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 260 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
260citing papers in PubMed
77.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

260 citing papers in PubMed, 619 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Crystal structure of rice L-galactose dehydrogenase.Acta crystallographica. Section F, Structural biology communications · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. RSC advances · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. The transcription factor AebHLH89 activatesHorticulture research · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

200 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicholas SmirnoffBiosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Geoffrey Pope Building, Stocker Road, Exeter EX4 4QD, UK. Electronic address: N.Smirnoff@exeter.ac.uk.
University of Exeter · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/G021678/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I020004/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N001311/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ascorbic acid is synthesised by eukaryotes, the known exceptions being primates and some other animal groups which have lost functional gulonolactone oxidase. Prokaryotes do not synthesise ascorbate and do not need an ascorbate supply, so the functions that are essential for mammals and plants are not required or are substituted by other compounds. The ability of ascorbate to donate electrons enables it to act as a free radical scavenger and to reduce higher oxidation states of iron to Fe

Indexed as

Epigenesis, GeneticAnimalsAntioxidantsAscorbate PeroxidasesAscorbic AcidHumansHydrogen PeroxideIronMammalsOxidation-ReductionOxidoreductases Acting on CH-CH Group DonorsPlantsAntioxidantsAscorbate PeroxidasesAscorbic Acidgalactonolactone dehydrogenaseHydrogen PeroxideIronOxidoreductases Acting on CH-CH Group DonorsAscorbate oxidaseAscorbate peroxidaseAscorbic acidDehydroascorbateDioxygenaseEpigeneticsGalactonolactone dehydrogenaseGulonolactone oxidaseHydrogen peroxideIron reductionMonodehydroascorbateVitamin Cvtc mutants

Identifiers

PMID29567393
PMCPMC6191929
OpenAlexW2791686911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.