Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29566726›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2018

Increased circulating resistin levels in early-onset breast cancer patients of normal body mass index correlate with lymph node negative involvement and longer disease free survival: a multi-center POSH cohort serum proteomics study.

Bashar Zeidan, Antigoni Manousopoulou, Diana J Garay-Baquero, Cory H White, Samantha E T Larkin, Kathleen N Potter, Theodoros I Roumeliotis, Evangelia K Papachristou, Ellen Copson, Ramsey I Cutress and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bashar ZeidanCancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Antigoni ManousopoulouInstitute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Diana J Garay-BaqueroInstitute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Cory H WhiteClinical and Experimental Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Samantha E T LarkinCancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Kathleen N PotterCancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Theodoros I RoumeliotisInstitute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Evangelia K PapachristouInstitute for Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Ellen CopsonCancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Ramsey I CutressCancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Stephen A BeersCancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Diana EcclesCancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Paul A TownsendDivision of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester Cancer Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science, Manchester Biomedical Research Centre, Health Innovation Manchester, Manchester, UK. paul.townsend@manchester.ac.uk.
Spiros D GarbisCancer Sciences Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. s.d.garbis@soton.ac.uk.
University of Southampton · GBMercy Medical Center · USUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 19187Medical Research Council MR/M008959/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly-onset breast cancer (EOBC) affects about one in 300 women aged 40 years or younger and is associated with worse outcomes than later onset breast cancer. This study explored novel serum proteins as surrogate markers of prognosis in patients with EOBC.

methodsSerum samples from EOBC patients (stages 1-3) were analysed using agnostic high-precision quantitative proteomics. Patients received anthracycline-based chemotherapy. The discovery cohort (n = 399) either had more than 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) (good outcome group, n = 203) or DFS of less than 2 years (poor outcome group, n = 196). Expressed proteins were assessed for differential expression between the two groups. Bioinformatics pathway and network analysis in combination with literature research were used to determine clinically relevant proteins. ELISA analysis against an independent sample set from the Prospective study of Outcomes in Sporadic versus Hereditary breast cancer (POSH) cohort (n = 181) was used to validate expression levels of the selected target. Linear and generalized linear modelling was applied to determine the effect of target markers, body mass index (BMI), lymph node involvement (LN), oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status on patients' outcome.

resultsA total of 5346 unique proteins were analysed (peptide FDR p ≤ 0.05). Of these, 812 were differentially expressed in the good vs poor outcome groups and showed significant enrichment for the insulin signalling (p = 0.01) and the glycolysis/gluconeogenesis (p = 0.01) pathways. These proteins further correlated with interaction networks involving glucose and fatty acid metabolism. A consistent nodal protein to these metabolic networks was resistin (upregulated in the good outcome group, p = 0.009). ELISA validation demonstrated resistin to be upregulated in the good outcome group (p = 0.04), irrespective of BMI and ER status. LN involvement was the only covariate with a significant association with resistin measurements (p = 0.004). An ancillary in-silico observation was the induction of the inflammatory response, leucocyte infiltration, lymphocyte migration and recruitment of phagocytes (p < 0.0001, z-score > 2). Survival analysis showed that resistin overexpression was associated with improved DFS.

conclusionsHigher circulating resistin correlated with node-negative patients and longer DFS independent of BMI and ER status in women with EOBC. Overexpression of serum resistin in EOBC may be a surrogate indicator of improved prognosis.

Indexed as

ProteomicsAdultBiomarkers, TumorBlood ProteinsBody Mass IndexBreast NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansInsulin ResistanceLymph NodesNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingPrognosisReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneBiomarkers, TumorBlood ProteinsReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneResistinEarly-onset breast cancerGlycolysis/gluconeogenesisInsulin resistancelymph-node involvementQuantitative serum proteomicsResistin

Identifiers

PMID29566726
PMCPMC5863447
OpenAlexW2797816589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.