Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29566698›Full record

ArticleBMC oral health2018

Effectiveness of an oral health intervention program for children with congenital heart defects.

Tine B Sivertsen, Anne N Åstrøm, Gottfried Greve, Jörg Aßmus, Marit S Skeie

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC oral health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03311438 (Evaluation of an Oral Health Intervention Program for Children With Congenital Heart Defects), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03311438 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of an Oral Health Intervention Program for Children With Congenital Heart Defects

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BergenRan2009 to 2016Enrolled75ConditionsCongenital Heart Defect, Dental Caries in Children, Dental Erosion, Dental PlaqueArmsOral health intervention program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Oral Health Status And Oral Health Related Quality of Life in Children With Congenital Heart Disease-A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis.Special care in dentistry : official publication of the American Association of Hospital Dentists, the Academy of Dentistry for the Handicapped, and the American Society for Geriatric Dentistry
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Dental caries and attendance to dental care in Finnish children with operated congenital heart disease. A practice based follow-up study.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tine B SivertsenDepartment of Clinical Dentistry, University of Bergen, Årstadveien 19, NO-5020, Bergen, Norway. tine.sivertsen@uib.no.
Anne N ÅstrømDepartment of Clinical Dentistry, University of Bergen, Årstadveien 19, NO-5020, Bergen, Norway.
Gottfried GreveDepartment of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, NO-5020, Bergen, Norway.
Jörg AßmusCentre for Clinical Research, Haukeland University Hospital, NO-5021, Bergen, Norway.
Marit S SkeieDepartment of Clinical Dentistry, University of Bergen, Årstadveien 19, NO-5020, Bergen, Norway.
University of Bergen · NOHaukeland University Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren with congenital heart defects (CHD) are reported to have poorer oral health compared with healthy children. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness of an intensive oral health care program among children with CHD followed from infancy to the age of 5 years, by comparing their oral health status at 5 years with a control group of children with CHD who had not received the program.

methodsIn this longitudinal study, children in western Norway with a need for lifelong follow-up due to congenital heart defects were invited to participate (n = 119). Children born in 2008-2011 were offered an oral health intervention program from infancy to the age of 5 years. The outcome measures for evaluating the intervention were dental caries prevalence, dental erosion, plaque index and gingival bleeding index. The data of the intervention group were compared with cross sectional oral health data of 5 year old controls with CHD born 2005-2007 (already published).

resultsEarly oral health intervention did not affect the prevalence of caries (25.3% versus 25.4%) or dental erosion (22.2% versus 19.7%) of children with CHD assessed at 5 years. Children in the intervention group were less likely than those in the control group to present with both dental plaque and gingival bleeding at age 5 years. In spite of no difference in caries prevalence between the groups, caries affected children (d

conclusionThe oral health promotive program did not influence the prevalence of caries nor dental erosion. However, the findings indicated better oral hygiene, reduced gingival bleeding and less untreated dentine caries in the intervention compared with the control group.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03311438 . Registration date: October 17th 2017, retrospectively registered.

Indexed as

Case-Control StudiesChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesDental Care for ChildrenDental CariesFemaleHeart Defects, CongenitalHumansInfantLongitudinal StudiesMaleMouth DiseasesNorwayOral HealthPeriodontal IndexProspective StudiesChildhood oral healthCongenital heart defectDental care for childrenSpecial care for children

Identifiers

PMID29566698
PMCPMC5865357
OpenAlexW2803295923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.