Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29566681›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Mapping staff perspectives towards the delivery of hospital care for children and young people with and without learning disabilities in England: a mixed methods national study.

Kate Oulton, Faith Gibson, Lucinda Carr, Angela Hassiotis, Carey Jewitt, Charlotte Kenten, Jessica Russell, Mark Whiting, Irene Tuffrey-Wijne, Jo Wray

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Implementation of training to improve communication with disabled children on the ward: A feasibility study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kate OultonCentre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children's Health, Illness and Disability (ORCHID), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, Level 4, Barclay House, 37 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BH, UK. Kate.oulton@gosh.nhs.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5778-3849
Faith GibsonCentre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children's Health, Illness and Disability (ORCHID), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, Level 4, Barclay House, 37 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BH, UK.
Lucinda CarrGreat Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, WC1N 3JH, UK.
Angela HassiotisUCL Division of Psychiatry, 6th Floor, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7NF, UK.
Carey JewittUCL Knowledge Lab, Institute of Education, 23-29 Emerald Street, London, WC1N 3QS, UK.
Charlotte KentenCentre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children's Health, Illness and Disability (ORCHID), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, Level 4, Barclay House, 37 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BH, UK.
Jessica RussellCentre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children's Health, Illness and Disability (ORCHID), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, Level 4, Barclay House, 37 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BH, UK.
Mark WhitingHealth Research Building, University of Hertfordshire, College Lane Campus, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9AB, UK.
Irene Tuffrey-WijneFaculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Kingston University and St George's University of London, 6th floor Hunter Wing, Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 0RE, UK.
Jo WrayCentre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children's Health, Illness and Disability (ORCHID), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, Level 4, Barclay House, 37 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3BH, UK.

Funding

Department of Health HS&DR/14/21/45Health Services and Delivery Research Programme 14/21/45
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren and young people (CYP) with learning disabilities (LD) are a vulnerable population with increased risk of abuse and accidental injury and whose parents have reported concerns about the quality, safety and accessibility of their hospital care. The Care Quality Commission's (CQC) view of best practice for this group of patients includes: access to senior LD nurse provision; a clearly visible flagging system for identifying them; the use of hospital passports; and defined communication strategies (Glasper, Comp Child Adolesc Nurs 40:63-67, 2017). What remains unclear is whether these recommendations are being applied and if so, what difference they are making. Furthermore, what we do not know is whether parental concerns of CYP with LD differ from parents of other children with long-term conditions. The aims of this study were to 1) describe the organisational context for healthcare delivery to CYP with LD and their families and 2) compare staff perceptions of their ability to identify the needs of CYP with and without LD and their families and provide high quality care to effectively meet these needs.

methodsIndividual interviews (n = 65) and anonymised online survey (n = 2261) were conducted with hospital staff working with CYP in 15 children's and 9 non-children's hospitals in England. The majority of interviews were conducted over the telephone and recorded and transcribed verbatim. Health Research Authority was obtained and verbal or written consent for data collection was obtained from all interview participants.

resultsThe nature and extent of organisational policies, systems and practices in place within hospitals to support the care of CYP with LD differs across England and some uncertainty exists within and across hospitals as to what is currently available and accessed. Staff perceived that those with LD were included less, valued less, and less safe than CYP without LD. They also reported having less confidence, capability and capacity to meet the needs of this population compared to those without LD.

conclusionFindings indicate inequality with regards the provision of high quality hospital care to children and young people with LD that meets their needs. There is a pressing need to understand the impact this has on them and their families.

trial registrationThe study has been registered on the NIHR CRN portfolio 20461 (Phase 1), 31336 (Phases 2-4).

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHealthcare DisparitiesChildChild Health ServicesEnglandHealth Care SurveysHealth Services Needs and DemandHealth Services ResearchHumansLearning DisabilitiesPersonnel, HospitalQualitative ResearchQuality of Health CareHealth services researchIntellectual disabilityLearning disabilityLong-term conditionsMixed methods

Identifiers

PMID29566681
PMCPMC5865304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.