Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29566648›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2018

Estimating the health consequences of flight attendant work: comparing flight attendant health to the general population in a cross-sectional study.

Eileen McNeely, Irina Mordukhovich, Samuel Tideman, Sara Gale, Brent Coull

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Estrogen signaling is necessary for the sex difference in simulated jet lag in mice.American journal of physiology. Endocrinology and metabolism · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Fatigue and Sleep in Airline Cabin Crew: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eileen McNeelyDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Irina MordukhovichDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. imordukh@hsph.harvard.edu.
Samuel TidemanDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Sara GaleDepartment of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Brent CoullDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

FAMRI CIA 150083
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFlight attendants are an understudied occupational group, despite undergoing a wide and unique range of adverse job-related exposures. In our study, we aimed to characterize the health profile of cabin crew relative to the U.S. general population.

methodsIn 2014-2015, we surveyed participants of the Harvard Flight Attendant Health Study. We compared the prevalence of their health conditions to a contemporaneous cohort in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES 2013-2014) using age-weighted standardized prevalence ratios (SPRs). We also analyzed associations between job tenure and selected health outcomes, using logistic regression and adjusting for potential confounders.

resultsCompared to the NHANES population (n = 2729), flight attendants (n = 5366) had a higher prevalence of female reproductive cancers (SPR = 1.66, 95% CI: 1.18-2.33), cancers at all sites (SPR = 2.15, 95% CI: 1.73-2.67 among females), as well as sleep disorders, fatigue, and depression, with SPRs ranging between 1.98 and 5.57 depending on gender and the specific condition examined. In contrast, we observed a decreased prevalence of cardiac and respiratory outcomes among flight crew relative to NHANES. Health conditions that increased with longer job tenure were sleep disorders, anxiety/depression, alcohol abuse, any cancer, peripheral artery disease, sinusitis, foot surgery, infertility, and several perinatal outcomes.

conclusionsWe observed higher rates of specific adverse health outcomes in U.S. flight attendants compared to the general population, as well as associations between longer tenure and health conditions, which should be interpreted in light of recall bias and a cross-sectional design. Future longitudinal studies should evaluate specific exposure-disease associations among flight crew.

Indexed as

Aerospace MedicineAdolescentAdultCohort StudiesCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFatigueFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsNutrition SurveysOccupational DiseasesPrevalenceUnited StatesCancerDepressionFatigueFlight attendantsOccupational epidemiology

Identifiers

PMID29566648
PMCPMC5865289

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.