Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29566213›Full record

ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2018

Long-term persistence with rituximab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Alexander G S Oldroyd, Deborah P M Symmons, Jamie C Sergeant, Lianne Kearsley-Fleet, Kath Watson, Mark Lunt, Kimme L Hyrich, BSRBR-RA Contributors Group

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Alexander G S OldroydArthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Deborah P M SymmonsArthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Jamie C SergeantArthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Lianne Kearsley-FleetArthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Kath WatsonArthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Mark LuntArthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Kimme L HyrichArthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
BSRBR-RA Contributors Group
University of Manchester · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GB

Funding

Arthritis Research UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the long term persistence of rituximab (RTX) in a large observational RA cohort, investigate persistence of RTX when used as a first or second line biologic DMARD (bDMARD), to characterize subsequent bDMARD treatment following RTX. Methods: Patients with RA starting treatment with RTX (MabThera) between 2008 and 2011 were recruited into the British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register for RA. Duration of RTX treatment over the first 4 years after initiation was estimated via Kaplan-Meier estimates and the reason for discontinuation was ascertained. Subsequent bDMARD use following RTX discontinuation was characterised. Treatment survival in bDMARD-naïve (first line RTX use) and experienced (second line RTX use) cohorts was described. Results: One thousand six hundred and twenty-nine patients were recruited (1371 bDMARD-experienced and 258 bDMARD-naïve). Sixty percent of the whole cohort remained on RTX after 4 years. Ineffectiveness (46%) and death (24%) were the most common reason for RTX discontinuation. RTX discontinuation was associated with RF negativity for the bDMARD-experienced cohort. Of those that discontinued RTX, 46% initiated treatment with another bDMARD, with tocilizumab being the most common. Conclusion: This large study of patients initiating RTX treatment for severe RA found that 60% persisted with treatment after 4 years. This study also identified that RTX is tolerated well when used as a first or second line bDMARD.

Indexed as

RegistriesAgedArthritis, RheumatoidFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunologic FactorsMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRituximabSurvival RateTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeUnited KingdomImmunologic FactorsRituximab

Identifiers

PMID29566213
PMCPMC5965076
OpenAlexW2783081258

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.