Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29566005›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

Evaluation of the cobas® GT hepatitis C virus genotyping assay in G1-6 viruses including low viral loads and LiPA failures.

Benjamin Némoz, Léa Roger, Vincent Leroy, Jean-Dominique Poveda, Patrice Morand, Sylvie Larrat

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Genotyping and treatment issues with 'unusual' HCV 1 subtypes.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2025
    Article
  2. Evaluation of the results of MOTAKK hepatitis C virus RNA genotyping and hepatitis delta virus external quality assessment programs during 2015-2016.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Benjamin NémozLaboratory of Virology, Institute for Biology and Pathology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3843-9380
Léa RogerLaboratory of Virology, Institute for Biology and Pathology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Vincent LeroyDepartment of Hepatology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Jean-Dominique PovedaCerba Laboratories, Cerba HealthCare, Saint-Ouen-l'Aumône, France.
Patrice MorandLaboratory of Virology, Institute for Biology and Pathology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Sylvie LarratLaboratory of Virology, Institute for Biology and Pathology, Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, Grenoble, France.
Université Grenoble Alpes · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRVirbac (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Direct-acting antiviral (DAA) drug performances depend on the viral genotype. So international recommendations give typing of the virus a prerequisite for treatment choice and patient management. Commercially available HCV genotyping kits are scarce and this analysis is often in-house using tedious PCRs and Sanger sequencing, leading to a lack of standardization. A newly commercialized HCV genotyping assay based on real-time PCR has been developed by Roche Diagnostics (Mannheim, Germany). We compared this new assay with our in-house PCRs -sequencing technique on 101 regular samples and 81 LiPA failures or low viral load samples. No genotype or 1a/1b subtype mismatch was observed. Two samples were misidentified at the subtype level without clinical impact. Three genotype 1b and two genotype 1a samples with low viral load could not be subtyped. Nevertheless, 13 (13%) samples from the regular panel and 35 (43%) from the more difficult-to-type panels failed to give results on first pass with the Roche kit. Failures were mostly associated with genotype 3 subtype a, with genotype 4 subtype non-a, or with viral loads <200 IU/mL (p = 0.0061). The workflow allowed a non-specialized technician to obtain results in less than 4 hours whereas 2 to 3 days and experienced staff were required with the in-house assay. In conclusion, the Roche cobas® HCV GT kit is easy and rapid to use and provides reliable results. The high rate of uninterpretable results particularly for low viral load samples and less frequent genotypes, and the absence of subtyping for non-genotype 1 could require sending complex samples to a specialized laboratory.

Indexed as

GenotypeAntiviral AgentsAsymptomatic InfectionsGenotyping TechniquesHepacivirusHepatitis C, ChronicHumansReagent Kits, DiagnosticReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRetrospective StudiesRNA, ViralSequence Analysis, RNASerologic TestsViral LoadAntiviral AgentsReagent Kits, DiagnosticRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID29566005
PMCPMC5864039
OpenAlexW2791179727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.