Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29565778›Full record

ArticleJournal of American college health : J of ACH

Validity of the AUDIT-C screen for at-risk drinking among students utilizing university primary care.

Clare E Campbell, Stephen A Maisto

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of American college health : J of ACH. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Mental health in Ukraine in 2023.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Clare E Campbella Department of Psychology , Syracuse University , Syracuse , New York , USA.
Stephen A Maistoa Department of Psychology , Syracuse University , Syracuse , New York , USA.

Funding

Research and Mentoring on Alcohol Clinical and Human Laboratory ResearchK05AA016928 · NIAAA · SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY · PI MAISTO, STEPHEN A · 2008 to 2017
$2.1M
NIAAA NIH HHS K05 AA016928
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveResearch is needed to establish the psychometric properties of brief screens in university primary care settings. This study aimed to assess the construct validity of one such screen, the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C), for detecting at-risk drinking among students who have utilized on-campus primary care.

participants389 students recently seen in university primary care completed a confidential online survey in December 2014.

methodsBivariate correlations between the AUDIT-C and measures of alcohol consumption and negative drinking consequences provided concurrent evidence for construct validity. Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analyses determined optimal cut-off scores for at-risk drinking.

resultsThe AUDIT-C significantly correlated with measures of alcohol consumption and negative drinking consequences (p < .001). Analyses support optimal AUDIT-C cut-off scores of 5 for females and 7 for males.

conclusionsThe AUDIT-C is a valid screen for at-risk drinking among students who utilize university primary care.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareAdultAlcohol Drinking in CollegeFemaleHumansMalePsychometricsSelf ReportStudentsSurveys and QuestionnairesUniversitiesYoung AdultAlcoholAUDIT-Ccollege studentsprimary carescreening

Identifiers

PMID29565778
PMCPMC6151161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.